Bug 18707 – Unable to inspect symbols

Bug 18707 - Unable to inspect symbols

Summary:	Unable to inspect symbols

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	gcc (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	7.0
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	high Severity high
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact:	Aaron Brown
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Duplicates:	22671 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2000-10-09 08:59 EDT by Marius Kintel
Modified:	2005-10-31 17:00 EST (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2000-12-31 06:14:56 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Marius Kintel 2000-10-09 08:59:05 EDT

Compile the following program: g++ -g test.cpp -o test

#include <stdio.h>

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
  for (int i=0;i<10;i++) {
    int test = i;
    printf("%d\n",test);
  }

}

Try running the program in gdb, break it at the printf-line.
Try inspecting the variables i and test. This does not work on my
plain RH7.0-box.

Comment 1 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2000-10-09 10:19:39 EDT

Daniel, could you take a look at this? I've confirmed the problem...

I'm not sure that gdb tries to handle locally instatiated variables, though.

Comment 2 Marius Kintel 2000-10-09 10:40:42 EDT

I compiled the same program on a RH6.2-box (using egcs-2.91.66).
Debugging that executable under RH7.0 works fine, so it looks like
it's g++'s fault.

Comment 3 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2000-10-09 10:52:27 EDT

Looks like it... Jakub?

Comment 4 Jakub Jelinek 2000-12-31 06:08:14 EST

Richard Henderson fixed this in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-12/msg01445.html
It will appear in gcc-2.96-70

Comment 5 Jakub Jelinek 2000-12-31 06:14:52 EST

*** Bug 22671 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.