Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1871434

Summary: theme css ".container" class rule is too generic
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Ron Lavi <rlavi>
Component: BrandingAssignee: Ron Lavi <rlavi>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Akhil Jha <akjha>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.8.0CC: bbuckingham, inecas, pcreech, sshtein
Target Milestone: 6.8.0Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: tfm-rubygem-foreman_theme_satellite-6.0.1.5-1 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-10-27 13:05:30 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
broken UI with container 21000px width
none
Fixed UI, with the gitlab PR none

Description Ron Lavi 2020-08-23 14:14:57 UTC
Description of problem:

The ".container" class rule is too generic,
and when there is a .container inside another .container it can cause width issues.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. go to configure -> inventory upload
2. open one of the org's list item card
3. 

Actual results:
the container element width has changes to ~21000px (I think it is caused after a css loop) and all of the features are pushed far away to the right.

Expected results:
the element width should remain in the page width.

Additional info:

Comment 2 Ron Lavi 2020-08-23 14:56:32 UTC
Created attachment 1712262 [details]
broken UI with container 21000px width

Comment 3 Ron Lavi 2020-08-23 14:57:42 UTC
Created attachment 1712263 [details]
Fixed UI, with the gitlab PR

Comment 10 Akhil Jha 2020-08-27 07:59:35 UTC
Verified.

Version Tested:  Satellite-6.8.0 Snap 13

Steps followed:
1 Configure -> Inventory Upload
2.Open one of the org's list item card

Observation:
The element width is in the page width.

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2020-10-27 13:05:30 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Satellite 6.8 release), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4366

Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2020-10-27 13:08:43 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Satellite 6.8 release), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4366