Bug 1874394
| Summary: | Unformatted and LDL DASD disks are not formatted with dasdfmt during text installation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Jan Stodola <jstodola> |
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Vendula Poncova <vponcova> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Alexandra Nikandrova <anikandr> |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 8.3 | CC: | jkonecny, pzatko, rvykydal, sbueno, sjalgaon, vponcova |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
| Target Release: | 8.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | anaconda-33.16.4.1-1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
.Anaconda now shows a dialog for `ldl` or unformatted DASD disks in text mode
Previously, during an installation in text mode, Anaconda failed to show a dialog for Linux disk layout (`ldl`) or unformatted Direct-Access Storage Device (DASD) disks. As a result, users were unable to utilize those disks for the installation.
With this update, in text mode Anaconda recognizes `ldl` and unformatted DASD disks and shows a dialog where users can format them properly for the future utilization for the installation.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-05-18 15:47:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1812825 | ||
|
Description
Jan Stodola
2020-09-01 09:24:45 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (anaconda bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:1844 |