Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:
Based on issues found in bz1855140:
 1. packet marks with masks broken in nftables backend (bug 1855140 comment 12)
 2. conflicting rich rule family and icmptype ip families (bug 1855140 comment 7)
https://github.com/firewalld/firewalld/pull/686

tests added with commits from the PR (includes coverage of marks and their /masks)
also:
/CoreOS/firewalld/Regression/rich-rules-unable-to-act-upon-icmp-packets (/masks were dropped from marks tests)
/CoreOS/firewalld/Regression/icmptypes-family-validity


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
firewalld-0.8.2-2.el8

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
firewall-cmd --add-rich-rule 'rule family=ipv6 icmp-type name=timestamp-request drop'

Actual results:
Error: COMMAND_FAILED and missing rules for certain combinations with iptables/nftables backend

Expected results:
success/specific firewalld error

Additional info:

Upstream commits:

54f2e490d422 ("test(features/rich_rules): add packet marks with masks")
cb904420da30 ("test(regression/rhbz1855140): add negative tests")
b6f3b98efca6 ("fix(nftables): icmp types with code == 0")
9d128274ee33 ("fix(nftables): packet marks with masks")
5ce18b613181 ("fix(rich icmptype): verify rule and icmptype families don't conflict")

Correct upstream commits:

22f8053f06ee ("test(features/rich_rules): add packet marks with masks")
b50032185422 ("test(regression/rhbz1855140): add negative tests")
098e35168d6a ("fix(nftables): icmp types with code == 0")
e296b926ae5d ("fix(nftables): packet marks with masks")
11aac7755d9c ("fix(rich icmptype): verify rule and icmptype families don't conflict")

*** Bug 1707483 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (firewalld bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:1643