Bug 1874905 - Add documentation on upgrading Websocket-Proxy on separate host
Summary: Add documentation on upgrading Websocket-Proxy on separate host
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: 4.4.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Steve Goodman
QA Contact: Lucie Leistnerova
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-09-02 14:48 UTC by Sandro Bonazzola
Modified: 2022-03-10 17:15 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-11-24 12:32:44 UTC
oVirt Team: Integration
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Sandro Bonazzola 2020-09-02 14:48:31 UTC
Description of problem:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.4/html/upgrade_guide/index
doesn't document how to upgrade Websoket-Proxy running on separate host.

Comment 1 Sandro Bonazzola 2020-09-10 07:27:00 UTC
Here the flow should be more or less like:
- take a backup on el7
- reinstall on el8 with websocket only
- restore the backup

PKI and configuration should be restored properly at this point, engine-setup may still be required.

Comment 2 Steve Goodman 2020-09-10 09:14:02 UTC
(In reply to Sandro Bonazzola from comment #1)
> Here the flow should be more or less like:
> - take a backup on el7
> - reinstall on el8 with websocket only

Can this host be the same host as the remote DWH machine (if there is one)? Can this host be used as a hypervisor as well as hosting the proxy?

Comment 3 Sandro Bonazzola 2020-10-15 08:50:27 UTC
(In reply to Steve Goodman from comment #2)
> (In reply to Sandro Bonazzola from comment #1)
> > Here the flow should be more or less like:
> > - take a backup on el7
> > - reinstall on el8 with websocket only
> 
> Can this host be the same host as the remote DWH machine (if there is one)?

Yes it can

> Can this host be used as a hypervisor as well as hosting the proxy?

No, websocket proxy shouldn't be on the hypervisor hosts. It's better to not mix RHV-M channels with hosts channels.

Comment 4 Steve Goodman 2020-10-26 15:54:18 UTC
Didi,

Can you provide any more details on this?

Comment 5 Sandro Bonazzola 2020-11-24 12:32:44 UTC
Closing this bug as won't fix. It has been decided to drop the effort of maintaining the possibility to install websocket proxy on separate host.

Comment 6 Yedidyah Bar David 2020-11-26 14:21:34 UTC
I didn't test, but I think comment 1 is mostly correct.

Not sure there is much value in this, though - it's probably easier to just install a new websocket-proxy on a new machine against the upgraded engine. This requires testing as well.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.