Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
there is a apparent incorrectly formatted error message
ERR - parent_update_on_childchange - Parent %s has no children. (op 0x%x, repl_op 0x%x)
the variables are not interpreted, and strangely, the next error message is appended, like if there was a missing carriage return, although there is clearly one in the code, in
./ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/parents.c
the parameters seem valid, but is cannot access//read slapi_entry_get_dn because it was deleted? ( may be a side effect of an unexpected error 1 in this example.)
but then why the \n would not be applied?
note this was with 389-ds-base-1.3.10.1-14.el7_8 , but on RHEL-7.4 instead of the tested RHEL-7.8
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
389-ds-base-1.3.10.1-14.el7_8.x86_64
RHEL-7.4
How reproducible:
N/A
happened several times in a customer environment
Steps to Reproduce:
1. N/A
2.
3.
Actual results:
access (edited)
[03/Sep/2020:20:09:24.278074084 +0300] conn=73050 op=66 DEL dn="cn=entry1,dc=example,dc=test"
[03/Sep/2020:20:09:24.290704098 +0300] conn=73050 op=66 RESULT err=1 tag=107 nentries=0 etime=0.012822845 csn=5f514d70000000100000
errors (edited)
[03/Sep/2020:20:09:24.278184398 +0300] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - ruv_add_csn_inprogress - Successfully inserted csn 5f514d70000000100000 into pending list
[03/Sep/2020:20:09:24.280256804 +0300] - ERR - parent_update_on_childchange - Parent %s has no children. (op 0x%x, repl_op 0x%x)
- cn=entry1,dc=example,dc=test[03/Sep/2020:20:09:24.281661564 +0300] - ERR - ldbm_back_delete - conn=73050 op=66 parent_update_on_childchange: old_entry=0x0x55807bbc6460, new_entry=0x(nil), rc=-1
[03/Sep/2020:20:09:24.289188838 +0300] - DEBUG - replication - multimaster_mmr_postop - error 0 for oparation 563.
[03/Sep/2020:20:09:24.290765002 +0300] - DEBUG - NSMMReplicationPlugin - process postop - conn=73050 op=66 csn=5f514d70000000100000 canceling operation csn
[03/Sep/2020:20:09:24.292106631 +0300] - ERR - NSMMReplicationPlugin - process_postop - Failed to apply update (5f514d70000000100000) error (1). Aborting replication session(conn=73050 op=66)
Expected results:
Additional info:
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory (389-ds-base bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5041
Comment 16Red Hat Bugzilla
2023-09-18 00:22:19 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days