Bug 1876843 - update the python script in the control plane config creation section
Summary: update the python script in the control plane config creation section
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1868439
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: 4.6
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.6.0
Assignee: Max Bridges
QA Contact: David Sanz
Vikram Goyal
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-09-08 10:26 UTC by Jatan Malde
Modified: 2020-09-24 12:20 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-09-24 12:20:38 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jatan Malde 2020-09-08 10:26:07 UTC 
Document URL: 

https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.6/installing/installing_openstack/installing-openstack-user.html#installation-osp-creating-control-plane-ignition_installing-openstack-user

Section Number and Name: 

Creating control plane Ignition config files

Describe the issue: 

Using the mentioned python script to create the master ignition file fails as the latest 4.6 installer uses ignitions with v.3.1.0 

Take a look at the following bugzilla,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876835

Suggestions for improvement: 

Include an updated python script to avoid the UPI install blocker since the master machines will not get created. 

Additional information:
Comment 2 Eric Rich 2020-09-18 18:30:13 UTC 
Should this be a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868439
Comment 3 Max Bridges 2020-09-18 18:55:14 UTC 
That other BZ definitely requires a docs update; I'll open a PR and reference it. 

This looks to be a duplicate, yes. Any objections to closing it?
Comment 4 Eric Rich 2020-09-24 11:19:11 UTC 
I am ok consolidating so long as we make sure to fix both issues (and the nuances of each bug).
Comment 5 Max Bridges 2020-09-24 12:20:38 UTC 
Thanks! Looks like the pending fix should resolve both, yes.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1868439 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.