Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1876843

Summary:	update the python script in the control plane config creation section
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	Jatan Malde <jmalde>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	Max Bridges <mbridges>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	David Sanz <dsanzmor>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:	Vikram Goyal <vigoyal>
Priority:	medium
Version:	4.6	CC:	aos-bugs, erich, jokerman, mbridges, vigoyal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	4.6.0
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-09-24 12:20:38 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jatan Malde 2020-09-08 10:26:07 UTC

Document URL: 

https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.6/installing/installing_openstack/installing-openstack-user.html#installation-osp-creating-control-plane-ignition_installing-openstack-user

Section Number and Name: 

Creating control plane Ignition config files

Describe the issue: 

Using the mentioned python script to create the master ignition file fails as the latest 4.6 installer uses ignitions with v.3.1.0 

Take a look at the following bugzilla,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876835

Suggestions for improvement: 

Include an updated python script to avoid the UPI install blocker since the master machines will not get created. 

Additional information:

Comment 2 Eric Rich 2020-09-18 18:30:13 UTC

Should this be a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868439

Comment 3 Max Bridges 2020-09-18 18:55:14 UTC

That other BZ definitely requires a docs update; I'll open a PR and reference it. 

This looks to be a duplicate, yes. Any objections to closing it?

Comment 4 Eric Rich 2020-09-24 11:19:11 UTC

I am ok consolidating so long as we make sure to fix both issues (and the nuances of each bug).

Comment 5 Max Bridges 2020-09-24 12:20:38 UTC

Thanks! Looks like the pending fix should resolve both, yes.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1868439 ***