Bug 1878285 - UI and other components still show Noobaa or Rook. Fix is likely non UI based.
Summary: UI and other components still show Noobaa or Rook. Fix is likely non UI based.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: ocs-operator
Version: 4.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Shiri mordechay
QA Contact: Raz Tamir
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1878283 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-09-11 19:23 UTC by Jean-Charles Lopez
Modified: 2023-08-09 17:00 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-09-24 16:23:08 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jean-Charles Lopez 2020-09-11 19:23:06 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):
While reviewing the UI with Pete Brey and Kyle Bader we reviewed the UI and the CLI output (pod or SC names) and found out that there are still many references to Noobaa, Rook and Ceph


Version of all relevant components (if applicable):
OCS 4.5 RC9

Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?
No

Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?
No

Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?
3

Can this issue reproducible?
Yes

Can this issue reproduce from the UI?
Yes

If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:
No

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Deploy OCS
2. Observe UI
3. Observe CLI output


Actual results:
References to noobaa rather than MCG

Expected results:
MCG everywhere

Additional info:
See document at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wj-3hgPPrZO98oJKxRCLpCyDxFC1EjZsgLvcwBTK4LU/edit?usp=sharing

Comment 2 Nimrod Becker 2020-09-14 09:56:48 UTC
what's the difference between this BZ and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878283 ?

Comment 3 Michael Adam 2020-09-14 14:53:45 UTC
(In reply to Nimrod Becker from comment #2)
> what's the difference between this BZ and
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878283 ?

Seems only the title and number.

Can we close one as duplicate?

Comment 4 Jean-Charles Lopez 2020-09-14 15:30:14 UTC
Hi Michael,

I insert in here the url to the other GDOc so you can close the other one (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878283)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DW21mLPVWWTvqpGZL5zt_llRhTEePKsGPzLAZmrQOBc/edit?usp=sharing

Comment 5 Mudit Agarwal 2020-09-30 16:48:16 UTC
Nimrod, are we considering both of these BZs for 4.6?

Comment 6 Nimrod Becker 2020-09-30 16:48:49 UTC
no

Comment 7 Mudit Agarwal 2021-02-02 12:34:20 UTC
*** Bug 1878283 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Jose A. Rivera 2021-02-03 15:02:28 UTC
I am also not inclined to consider this for OCS 4.7, since it is not a critical need for the operation of the product. Deferring to OCS 4.8.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.