Bug 1878301 - [4.6] [UI] Unschedulable used to always be displayed when Node is Ready status
Summary: [4.6] [UI] Unschedulable used to always be displayed when Node is Ready status
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Management Console
Version: 4.6
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.7.0
Assignee: Cyril
QA Contact: Siva Reddy
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-09-11 20:11 UTC by mlammon
Modified: 2021-02-24 15:18 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: Incorrect code Consequence: Unschedulable status field only showing when true Fix: Yes. Implemented the UX new design to resolve the bug. Result: Working as expected.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-02-24 15:17:46 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
In Maint, screenshot (157.00 KB, image/png)
2020-09-11 20:11 UTC, mlammon
no flags Details
Not in maintenance (153.12 KB, image/png)
2020-09-11 20:11 UTC, mlammon
no flags Details
notReady status (253.56 KB, image/png)
2020-10-14 21:17 UTC, Siva Reddy
no flags Details
ready status (146.09 KB, image/png)
2020-10-14 21:17 UTC, Siva Reddy
no flags Details
schedulingDisabled (145.34 KB, image/png)
2020-10-14 21:18 UTC, Siva Reddy
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github openshift console pull 6852 0 None closed Bug 1878301: Improve display of node unschedulable status 2021-02-17 20:52:55 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2020:5633 0 None None None 2021-02-24 15:18:22 UTC

Description mlammon 2020-09-11 20:11:13 UTC
Created attachment 1714602 [details]
In Maint, screenshot

Created attachment 1714602 [details]
In Maint, screenshot

Created attachment 1714602 [details]
In Maint, screenshot

Description of problem:
Unschedulable used to always be displayed when Node is Ready status, it now only showes when in Maintenance mode
and status = False

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Install OCP 4.6 with CNV 2.5 (which has NMO)
2.  Compute->Nodes->3dot kebab button on master-0-0 (click)
3. Compute->Nodes->master-0-0, view all
   Unscheduable status missing
4. Test again by putting node in maintenance

Actual results:
Unschedulable status field only showing when true

Expected results:
Expect Unscheduable status field exist and show false in normal Ready mode


Additional info:

Comment 1 mlammon 2020-09-11 20:11:48 UTC
Created attachment 1714603 [details]
Not in maintenance

Comment 2 Jiri Tomasek 2020-09-14 07:30:05 UTC
By default resource properties are not displayed when in falsy value. I am not sure if the case of 'unschedulable' should be treated differently.

Comment 3 Andy Braren 2020-09-14 23:56:56 UTC
The same behavior seems to apply even without CNV/NMO installed, so this may not be Metal3/CNV-specific. If I remember correctly (I don't have a bare metal cluster available to test) the "Mark as Unschedulable" action in base OCP turns into "Start maintenance" with CNV/NMO installed which includes marking the node as unschedulable.

I'll double check this with Console stakeholders at a meeting next week, but I believe Details pages of the Console generally try to reflect what's inside the resource's YAML. When a node is marked as unschedulable via the UI, I see this in its YAML:

spec:
  ...
  unschedulable: true

but when it's schedulable I notice that the key/value pair disappears entirely from the YAML instead of being changed to `unschedulable: false`.

Maybe the way the UI updates the YAML changed which is why the behavior is different now, or maybe removing/hiding the field was intentional since seeing the double negative `Unschedulable: False` all the time could be a little weird/confusing.

I'll follow up.

Comment 4 Cyril 2020-09-28 14:33:16 UTC
Waiting on an updated design from UX before this issus can be consider.

Comment 5 Andy Braren 2020-09-28 19:23:39 UTC
After discussing this with Console stakeholders we've agreed on a new design that:

1. Removes the `Unschedulable: True` field from the Details page entirely (its information is duplicated by what's shown in the node's `Status`)
2. Updates the node's `Status` to include a yellow warning triangle icon while unschedulable, a popover explaining what that means, and an action to make the node schedulable again

These adjustments should resolve this bug and make it easier to notice, understand, and manage unscheduled nodes.

Here's the design (2 screens):
https://marvelapp.com/prototype/f57h3d4/screen/73102504

Comment 6 mlammon 2020-09-28 20:49:11 UTC
Looks great!

Comment 10 Yanping Zhang 2020-10-14 11:59:53 UTC
@mlammon , the bug is targeted to 4.7.0, and the fix is in 4.7 payload.

Comment 11 Siva Reddy 2020-10-14 21:16:29 UTC
The node status now includes the scheduling information also.

Version:
  4.7.0-0.nightly-2020-10-14-101154

Steps to verify:
1. login to console which has a node scheduling disabled
2. navigate to PageSideBar>Compute>nodes and click on the node and go to details tab
3. Notice that the status has scheduling disabled warning
4. Now make the node scheduling enabled
    # oc adm uncordon <node>
5. Note the status is changed to ready
6. delete the node from the cluster and notice that it goes to not ready state.

attached screen shots

Comment 12 Siva Reddy 2020-10-14 21:17:04 UTC
Created attachment 1721601 [details]
notReady status

Comment 13 Siva Reddy 2020-10-14 21:17:35 UTC
Created attachment 1721602 [details]
ready status

Comment 14 Siva Reddy 2020-10-14 21:18:05 UTC
Created attachment 1721603 [details]
schedulingDisabled

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2021-02-24 15:17:46 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.7.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5633


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.