Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1880474

Summary: Missing policy rule prevents using Labeled IPsec
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Stepan Broz <sbroz>
Component: selinux-policyAssignee: Zdenek Pytela <zpytela>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 8.2CC: apeetham, lvrabec, mmalik, plautrba, ssekidde, tscherf
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: 8.4Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: Selinux policy is missing a rule to set the context of an IPSec association on creation Consequence: IPSec when configured with "labeled-ipsec=yes" is not working properly. Fix: A rule to set the context of an IPSec association was added to the policy. Result: Labeled IPSec works.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-18 14:57:54 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Stepan Broz 2020-09-18 16:13:35 UTC
Description of problem:
The following missing policy prevents using Labeled IPsec in RHEL8 in SELinux enforcing mode:

#============= ipsec_t ==============
allow ipsec_t ipsec_spd_t:association setcontext;


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-3.14.3-48.el8.noarch
selinux-policy-targeted-3.14.3-48.el8.noarch

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Configure labeled IPsec in /etc/ipsec.conf:

config setup
	secctx-attr-type=32001

2. Configure labeled IPsec in the connection configuration:

conn labeltest
  left=host1.example.com
  leftcert="host1cert"
  right=host2.example.com
  leftid=%fromcert
  rightid=%fromcert
  ikev2=no
  authby=rsasig
  labeled-ipsec=yes
  policy-label=system_u:object_r:ipsec_spd_t:s0
  ike=aes256-sha256;modp2048
  esp=aes128-sha256;modp2048
  auto=add

3. Start the "ipsec" service:

    # systemctl start ipsec

4. Bring the connection up:

    # ipsec auto --up labeltest

Actual results:
type=AVC msg=audit(1600445069.909:547): avc:  denied  { setcontext } for  pid=18887 comm="pluto" scontext=system_u:system_r:ipsec_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:ipsec_spd_t:s0 tclass=association permissive=0

Expected results:
Working Labeled IPsec

Additional info:

Comment 1 Stepan Broz 2020-09-18 16:16:19 UTC
Tested with libreswan-3.29-7.el8_2.x86_64.

Comment 6 Zdenek Pytela 2020-12-16 19:23:52 UTC
I've just submitted a Fedora PR to address the issue:
https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/pull/516

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2021-05-18 14:57:54 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (selinux-policy bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:1639