Bug 1881153 (ocp-46-z-tracker) - Tracker bug for OCP 4.6 on Z issues
Summary: Tracker bug for OCP 4.6 on Z issues
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: ocp-46-z-tracker
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Multi-Arch
Version: 4.6
Hardware: s390x
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.6.z
Assignee: Jeremy Poulin
QA Contact: Douglas Slavens
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1868445 1868799 1878766 1878770 1878772 1878774 1878780 1882191 1882767 1884297 1885737 1888065 1896770 1897482
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-09-21 16:09 UTC by wvoesch
Modified: 2022-09-12 22:03 UTC (History)
14 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-09-12 22:03:53 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description wvoesch 2020-09-21 16:09:15 UTC
Tracker bug for OCP 4.6 on Z issues

Comment 1 Dan Li 2020-09-22 12:21:23 UTC
Adding a "Target Release" before the bug is evaluated by team. The Target Release is initially set to 4.6 because this is a non-blocker and is a 4.6 related bug.

Comment 2 Hendrik Brueckner 2020-09-22 14:35:25 UTC
Hi Dan,

(In reply to Dan Li from comment #1)
> Adding a "Target Release" before the bug is evaluated by team. The Target
> Release is initially set to 4.6 because this is a non-blocker and is a 4.6
> related bug.

the intention is to use this BZ just as tracker. I am not sure if you already have one (as usual practice on RHEL). At least, I saw a couple of bugs here and there and like to have a tracker to see the entire picture. We probably could improve this on tracking per release or other. Any ideas are welcome.

Comment 3 Dan Li 2020-09-22 17:43:19 UTC
Thank you for the explanation, Hendrik. That is my understanding as well. By system rule, any 4.6 bug that does not have a target release set is considered to be "untriaged". That was the reason for my change earlier.

Comment 4 Yaakov Selkowitz 2020-09-24 11:58:16 UTC
OCP bug protocol is different than RHEL's, and doesn't really work with tracker bugs.  I think you'll need to use Jira for tracking purposes.

Comment 5 Dan Li 2020-09-28 15:29:22 UTC
Adding UpcomingSprint label as this is a tracker bug (not an actual bug).

Comment 6 Christian LaPolt 2020-10-15 21:02:22 UTC
1888754

Comment 8 Dan Li 2020-10-19 19:28:04 UTC
Adding UpcomingSprint label as this is a tracker bug (not an actual bug).

Comment 9 Christian LaPolt 2020-10-20 17:47:53 UTC
(In reply to Christian LaPolt from comment #6)
> 1888754
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889427 - 4.5.15 unable to update. Still open but appears to be fixed

Comment 11 Dan Li 2020-10-30 12:49:40 UTC
1. Setting this bug as low priority because it is a tracker bug (not an actual bug)
2. Keeping the assignee as Dennis but changing the status as Assigned. There are no actions to be taken with this bug

Comment 12 Dan Li 2020-11-09 15:11:07 UTC
Adding UpcomingSprint label as this is a tracker bug (not an actual bug).

Comment 13 Dan Li 2020-11-30 17:56:49 UTC
Adding UpcomingSprint label as this is a tracker bug (not an actual bug).

Comment 14 Dan Li 2020-12-15 18:02:09 UTC
Adding UpcomingSprint label as this is a tracker bug (not an actual bug).

Comment 15 Dan Li 2021-01-11 17:01:26 UTC
Adding UpcomingSprint label as this is a tracker bug (not an actual bug).

Comment 16 Dan Li 2021-02-01 14:59:46 UTC
Taking this tracker bug from Dennis as I have been coordinating bug triaging with the team.

Comment 17 Dan Li 2021-02-01 15:00:29 UTC
Setting the "Reviewed-in-Sprint" flag to + as this is a tracker bug (not an actual bug)

Comment 18 Dan Li 2021-02-22 18:18:20 UTC
Setting the "Reviewed-in-Sprint" flag to + as this is a tracker bug (not an actual bug)

Comment 19 Dan Li 2021-03-15 18:01:33 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 20 Dan Li 2021-04-05 18:58:14 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 21 Dan Li 2021-04-26 19:51:38 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 22 Dan Li 2021-05-17 19:32:38 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 23 Dan Li 2021-06-07 18:25:22 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 24 Dan Li 2021-06-28 19:53:32 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 25 Dan Li 2021-07-19 18:51:00 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 26 Dan Li 2021-08-09 23:40:41 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 27 Dan Li 2021-08-30 16:38:42 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 28 Dan Li 2021-10-11 14:44:27 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 29 Dan Li 2021-11-01 13:31:06 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 30 Dan Li 2021-11-22 21:10:25 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 31 Dan Li 2022-01-04 18:28:56 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 32 Dan Li 2022-01-24 18:09:04 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 33 Dan Li 2022-02-14 18:45:26 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 34 Dan Li 2022-03-07 14:50:12 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 35 Dan Li 2022-04-18 13:45:12 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 36 Dan Li 2022-05-09 13:28:13 UTC
Setting "Reviewed-in-Sprint" as this is a tracker bug only (not an actual bug).

Comment 39 Douglas Slavens 2022-09-12 22:03:53 UTC
All the dependent bugs have been closed so closing this bz.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.