Description of problem: Currently we have the following parameters described in filter:authtoken section of proxy-server.conf . /var/lib/config-data/puppet-generated/swift/etc/swift/proxy-server.conf ~~~ [filter:authtoken] paste.filter_factory = keystonemiddleware.auth_token:filter_factory project_name = service username = swift password = <password> auth_host = 127.0.0.1 auth_port = 35357 auth_protocol = http signing_dir = /var/cache/swift log_name=swift www_authenticate_uri=http://172.17.1.49:5000 auth_url=http://172.17.1.49:5000 auth_plugin=password project_domain_id=default user_domain_id=default delay_auth_decision=1 cache=swift.cache include_service_catalog=False ~~~ However, the following 3 parameters have no effect in fact, since it is only used for old authentication mechanism with admin token. - admin_host - admin_port - admin_protocol It seems that these settings come from the default conf file included in rpm file, and it would be better to remove these lines to avoid confusing content. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Deploy overcloud/undercloud 2. See proxy-server.conf Actual results: The .conf file includes some unused options (auth_host, auth_port and auth_protocol) Expected results: The .conf file doesn't include unused options (auth_host, auth_port and auth_protocol) Additional info:
Change to RDO was merged 03/22/2021.
I've sent the backport up to train: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/swift-distgit/+/35674 https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/swift-distgit/+/35675 https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/openstack/swift-distgit/+/35676
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Release of components for Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2.2), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:1001