Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1882502

Summary:	EgressRouter: error in getting result from AddNetwork: CNI request failed with status 400
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	Alexander Constantinescu <aconstan>
Component:	Networking	Assignee:	Alexander Constantinescu <aconstan>
Networking sub component:	openshift-sdn	QA Contact:	Weibin Liang <weliang>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	Docs Contact:
Severity:	high
Priority:	medium	CC:	aconstan, anbhat, anusaxen, bbennett, danw, weliang, xtian
Version:	4.5
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	4.5.z
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1852593	Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-01-20 05:49:27 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1852593
Bug Blocks:

Comment 2 Weibin Liang 2021-01-04 18:36:07 UTC

Tested and verified in 4.5.0-0.nightly-2021-01-03-162026

[weliang@weliang ~]$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION                             AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.5.0-0.nightly-2021-01-03-162026   True        False         133m    Cluster version is 4.5.0-0.nightly-2021-01-03-162026
[weliang@weliang ~]$ oc get pod
NAME                    READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE
egress-http-proxy-pod   1/1     Running   0          65s
[weliang@weliang ~]$

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2021-01-20 05:49:27 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.5.27 bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0033