Description of problem: This packages recommends 'kmod(gfs2.ko)' which can be satisfied by kernel-debug-modules-extra or by kernel-modules-extra. For some unknown reason dnf prefers the longer name. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Probably a very old problem How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf remove kernel-modules-extra (if installed) 2. dnf upgrade gfs2-utils 3. Actual results: kernel-debug-modules-extra, kernel-debug-core, and kernel-debug-modules are installed. Expected results: kernel-modules-extra is installed Additional info: The module xl2tpd fixed a similar problem by adding these lines to the spec file. # dnf resolving prefers kernel-debug-modules-extra over kernel-modules-extra Suggests: kernel-modules-extra
This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '32'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 32 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Issue also seen in gfs2-utils-3.4.1-1.fc34.x86_64
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 34 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 34 on 2022-06-07. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a 'version' of '34'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' to a later Fedora Linux version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora Linux 34 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version prior to this bug being closed.
Also seen in Fedora 36.
I'm unable to reproduce this but it does seem to be a broader issue that was filed as bug 1652823. Closing as a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1652823 ***
(In reply to Andrew Price from comment #5) > I'm unable to reproduce this but it does seem to be a broader issue that was > filed as bug 1652823. Closing as a duplicate. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1652823 *** Have you perhaps disabled "install_weak_deps" in dnf.conf? Or is kernel-modules-extra already installed?
(In reply to Villy Kruse from comment #6) > (In reply to Andrew Price from comment #5) > > I'm unable to reproduce this but it does seem to be a broader issue that was > > filed as bug 1652823. Closing as a duplicate. > > > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1652823 *** > > Have you perhaps disabled "install_weak_deps" in dnf.conf? Or is > kernel-modules-extra already installed? Neither. I suspect that either package could be picked when dnf has no hint to give one priority over the other, so we're seeing different results by chance.
(In reply to Andrew Price from comment #7) > (In reply to Villy Kruse from comment #6) > > (In reply to Andrew Price from comment #5) > > > I'm unable to reproduce this but it does seem to be a broader issue that was > > > filed as bug 1652823. Closing as a duplicate. > > > > > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1652823 *** > > > > Have you perhaps disabled "install_weak_deps" in dnf.conf? Or is > > kernel-modules-extra already installed? > > Neither. I suspect that either package could be picked when dnf has no hint > to give one priority over the other, so we're seeing different results by > chance. Or you have a secret configuration setting that fixes this. You get somthing that looks like this? Dependencies resolved. ============================================================================ Package Architecture Version Repository Size ============================================================================ Installing: gfs2-utils x86_64 3.4.1-3.fc36 fedora 316 k Installing weak dependenc kernel-modules-extra x86_64 5.17.6-300.fc36 updates 3.4 M Transaction Summary ============================================================================ Install 2 Packages Total download size: 3.7 M Installed size: 4.0 M instead of Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Architecture Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: gfs2-utils x86_64 3.4.1-3.fc36 fedora 316 k Installing dependencies: kernel-debug-core x86_64 5.17.6-300.fc36 updates 48 M kernel-debug-devel x86_64 5.17.6-300.fc36 updates 15 M kernel-debug-devel-matched x86_64 5.17.6-300.fc36 updates 163 k kernel-debug-modules x86_64 5.17.6-300.fc36 updates 54 M Installing weak dependencies: kernel-debug-modules-extra x86_64 5.17.6-300.fc36 updates 3.5 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 6 Packages Total download size: 121 M Installed size: 212 M