Testing DNF upgrade of F32 to F33: [root@fpgm ~]# dnf --releasever=33 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f33 --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:58 ago on Fri 02 Oct 2020 09:06:41 AM EDT. Error: Problem: package perl-Crypt-Random-TESHA2-0.01-15.fc32.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.1), but none of the providers can be installed - perl-libs-4:5.30.3-456.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package perl-Crypt-Random-TESHA2-0.01-15.fc32.noarch - package perl-libs-4:5.30.3-454.module_f33+9369+dac0eadc.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.30.3-454.module_f33+9711+083176da.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.30.3-455.module_f33+10047+8c6c443b.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
perl-Crypt-Random-TESHA2 was removed since Fedora 33, because it was orphaned more than 6 week.
Reassigning to fedora-obsolete-packages, which does not list perl-Crypt-Random-TESHA2
I suppose we could obsolete all removed Perl packages similarly to bz1856098. Jitka, do you want me to do that or would you prefer to only obsolete packages causing user reported problems (like this one)?
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #3) > I suppose we could obsolete all removed Perl packages similarly to > bz1856098. Jitka, do you want me to do that or would you prefer to only > obsolete packages causing user reported problems (like this one)? Please do it, I would really appreciate it.
I took packages that require either of the following on Fedora 31 or 32: libperl.so.5.30()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.0) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.1) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.2) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.3) Is that a complete list? Such packages that no longer exists in Fedora 33, but are not yet obsoleted by anything, will be obsoleted by f-p-o: (Read %obsolete as Obsoletes: %1 < %2.) %obsolete glite-lb-types 2.0.10-18 %obsolete gpsdrive 2.11-54 %obsolete mirrorbrain-scanner 2.18.1-27 %obsolete opendchub 0.8.3-20 %obsolete perl-CPAN-Reporter 1.2018-12 %obsolete perl-Compress-LZ4 0.25-12 %obsolete perl-Compress-Snappy 0.24-16 %obsolete perl-Crypt-PBKDF2 0.161520-12 %obsolete perl-Crypt-Random-TESHA2 0.01-16 %obsolete perl-Crypt-SaltedHash 0.09-18 %obsolete perl-Date-Easter 1.22-16 %obsolete perl-Digest-Bcrypt 1.209-11 %obsolete perl-Digest-PBKDF2 0.013-9 %obsolete perl-Filesys-SmbClient 3.2-22 %obsolete perl-GStreamer 0.20-18 %obsolete perl-Geo-Point 0.98-4 %obsolete perl-Geo-Proj4 1.09-4 %obsolete perl-Image-SubImageFind 0.03-23 %obsolete perl-Module-Data 0.013-11 %obsolete perl-Parse-CPAN-Packages-Fast 0.09-14 %obsolete perl-Path-ScanINC 1.000003-11 %obsolete perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu 1.132680-25 %obsolete perl-SOCKS 0.03-17 %obsolete perl-Test2-Plugin-SpecDeclare 0.000003-12 %obsolete perl-Time-TAI64 2.11-16 %obsolete perl-X11-GUITest 0.28-20 %obsolete perl-perl5i 2.13.2-14 %obsolete perl-qpid-messaging 1.39.0-6 %obsolete perl-re-engine-PCRE2 0.16-5 %obsolete zanata-util 0.2.9-20 For rawhide, I found one additional package: %obsolete perl-sword 1.8.1-20 I'll rerun the query after the freeze to get a more complete list.
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #5) > I took packages that require either of the following on Fedora 31 or 32: > > libperl.so.5.30()(64bit) > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.0) > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.1) > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.2) > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.3) > > Is that a complete list? Yes, the list is complete. > Such packages that no longer exists in Fedora 33, but are not yet obsoleted > by anything, will be obsoleted by f-p-o: > > (Read %obsolete as Obsoletes: %1 < %2.) > > %obsolete glite-lb-types 2.0.10-18 > %obsolete gpsdrive 2.11-54 > %obsolete mirrorbrain-scanner 2.18.1-27 > %obsolete opendchub 0.8.3-20 > %obsolete perl-CPAN-Reporter 1.2018-12 > %obsolete perl-Compress-LZ4 0.25-12 > %obsolete perl-Compress-Snappy 0.24-16 > %obsolete perl-Crypt-PBKDF2 0.161520-12 > %obsolete perl-Crypt-Random-TESHA2 0.01-16 > %obsolete perl-Crypt-SaltedHash 0.09-18 > %obsolete perl-Date-Easter 1.22-16 > %obsolete perl-Digest-Bcrypt 1.209-11 > %obsolete perl-Digest-PBKDF2 0.013-9 > %obsolete perl-Filesys-SmbClient 3.2-22 > %obsolete perl-GStreamer 0.20-18 > %obsolete perl-Geo-Point 0.98-4 > %obsolete perl-Geo-Proj4 1.09-4 > %obsolete perl-Image-SubImageFind 0.03-23 > %obsolete perl-Module-Data 0.013-11 > %obsolete perl-Parse-CPAN-Packages-Fast 0.09-14 > %obsolete perl-Path-ScanINC 1.000003-11 > %obsolete perl-Pod-Wordlist-hanekomu 1.132680-25 > %obsolete perl-SOCKS 0.03-17 > %obsolete perl-Test2-Plugin-SpecDeclare 0.000003-12 > %obsolete perl-Time-TAI64 2.11-16 > %obsolete perl-X11-GUITest 0.28-20 > %obsolete perl-perl5i 2.13.2-14 > %obsolete perl-qpid-messaging 1.39.0-6 > %obsolete perl-re-engine-PCRE2 0.16-5 > %obsolete zanata-util 0.2.9-20 > > > For rawhide, I found one additional package: > > > %obsolete perl-sword 1.8.1-20 The sub-package is not build for sword version 1.9.0RC1. However, I am not sure, if the maitainer want to add it back or not. > > I'll rerun the query after the freeze to get a more complete list.
> Yes, the list is complete. Thanks for confirming! > However, I am not sure, if the maitainer want to add it back or not. If they add it back, they'll bump the release, so it should be safe.
Discussed during the 2020-10-05 blocker review meeting: [0] The decision to classify this bug as an "AcceptedFreezeException (Final)" was made as it is a noticeable issue that cannot be fixed with an update. [0] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2020-10-05/f33-blocker-review.2020-10-05-16.00.txt
FEDORA-2020-879e65ad1f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-879e65ad1f
FEDORA-2020-879e65ad1f has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-879e65ad1f` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-879e65ad1f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2020-879e65ad1f has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
I am running Fedora 33 and I still get this error. Here is the output when I run: dnf install asbru-cm Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-5.2.1-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.0.0-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.0.1-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.0.2-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.0.3-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.0.4-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.1.0-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.1.0rc1-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.1.0rc2-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.1.1-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.1.2-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.1.3-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.2.0-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.2.1-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.2.2~1602874840-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.2.2~1602875691-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.2.2~1602943787-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.2.2~1602967851-1.fc30.noarch - nothing provides perl-X11-GUITest needed by asbru-cm-6.2.2~1602968644-1.fc30.noarch
That is a different problem. Please report it to the place where asbru-cm is coming from, it doesn't seem to be an official Fedora package.