RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1889343 - CVE-2020-10747 Clarification that roles are not meant for privilege escalation
Summary: CVE-2020-10747 Clarification that roles are not meant for privilege escalation
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: doc-Linux_Domain_Identity_Management_Guide
Version: 7.9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Florian Delehaye
QA Contact: ipa-qe
Florian Delehaye
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-10-19 12:32 UTC by Florian Delehaye
Modified: 2020-10-19 13:51 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-10-19 13:51:35 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Florian Delehaye 2020-10-19 12:32:54 UTC
Document URL: 
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/linux_domain_identity_authentication_and_policy_guide/defining-roles

Section Number and Name: 
10.4. Defining Role-Based Access Controls

Describe the issue: 
We recently had a CVE-2020-10747 that was retracted. However, as a part
of the analysis for that retraction we identified that documentation is
not clear about the state of privileges in FreeIPA.
Ideally, we need a 'Note'
in https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/linux_domain_identity_authentication_and_policy_guide/defining-roles
be modified to very clearly state what Simo proposed.

Suggestions for improvement: 
"Roles are used to classify permitted actions but are not used as a tool to
implement privilege separation or to protect from privilege escalation"


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.