Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 1889435

Summary:	(CVE-2020-27839) [security] Don't use Browser's LocalStorage for storing JWT but Secure Cookies with proper HTTP Headers
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Ernesto Puerta <epuertat>
Component:	Ceph-Dashboard	Assignee:	avan <athakkar>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Sunil Angadi <sangadi>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:	Ranjini M N <rmandyam>
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.0	CC:	athakkar, ceph-eng-bugs, kdreyer, rmandyam, sangadi, tserlin, vereddy
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Security
Target Release:	5.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	security
Fixed In Version:	ceph-16.0.0-8633.el8cp	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	.Secure cookie-based sessions are enabled for accessing the {storage-product} Dashboard Previously, storing information in LocalStorage made the {storage-product} dashboard accessible to all sessions running in a browser, making the dashboard vulnerable to XSS attacks. With this release, LocalStorage is replaced with secure cookie-based sessions and thereby the session secret is available only to the current browser instance.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-08-30 08:26:43 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1959686

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2021-08-30 08:26:43 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.0 bug fix and enhancement), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:3294