Bug 188946 - Review Request: contacts
Summary: Review Request: contacts
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Cantrell
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-04-13 20:27 UTC by David Nielsen
Modified: 2013-01-10 01:23 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-04-27 03:10:25 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
SPEC file (1.33 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-04-13 21:36 UTC, David Nielsen
no flags Details

Description David Nielsen 2006-04-13 20:27:47 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/contacts.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/contact-0.1-1.src.rpm
Description: Contacts is a tiny standalone application to view contact data available via evolution-data-server

Be gentle, this is my first venture into SPEC authoring

Comment 1 Jesse Keating 2006-04-13 21:17:03 UTC
So, a few things going on here in the spec that should be looked at:

- Source url should not use macros
- PreReq seems a bit odd, why the Pre and the regular Req?
- Use of defines at the top seems a bit much.  Why define it to use it in only
one place? (one place if you don't hard specify Requires)
- Hard specified Requires, rpm should be able to figure this out on its own
- Graphical app but no .desktop file
- Files section is referencing directories rather than files within directories.

Other than that its a good start (;

Comment 2 Jesse Keating 2006-04-13 21:23:47 UTC
Whoops, macro in Source url is fine.

Comment 3 David Nielsen 2006-04-13 21:33:59 UTC
I fixed the obvious stuff, thank you for the review.

Comment 4 David Nielsen 2006-04-13 21:36:13 UTC
Created attachment 127729 [details]
SPEC file

Comment 5 Brian Pepple 2006-04-13 22:59:38 UTC
The desktop file needs to have some bits changed specific for Fedora.  You need
to add this to the %install section:

desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original	\
  --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications   	\
  --add-category X-Fedora			        \
  $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop

And in the %files section the desktop file needs to be:
%{_datadir}/applications/fedora-%{name}.desktop

Comment 6 Brian Pepple 2006-04-13 23:06:27 UTC
David, is the link to your spec file valid?

Comment 7 Brian Pepple 2006-04-13 23:14:46 UTC
Whoops, forgot to mention in comment #5, that you can drop the BuildRequires for
glib2-devel and gtk2-devel,since the libglade2-devel package will pull these in.

Comment 8 David Nielsen 2006-04-13 23:31:46 UTC
Thank you for the review Brian.. yes the link is valid.

I updated the spec file to include the changes you suggested and uploaded new
versions.

Comment 9 Jesse Keating 2006-04-14 03:46:22 UTC
Now you need desktop-file-utils as a BuildRequires since you'll be using it in
the %install section.  I added that in a local copy of your spec and used that
to build packages.  Rpmlint output coming up.



Comment 10 Jesse Keating 2006-04-14 04:46:44 UTC
rpmlint is silent, no problems.  So fix the BuildRequires and I think we're in
business.  I just have to lookup how to sponsor you.

Comment 11 Josh Boyer 2006-04-14 10:55:26 UTC
(In reply to comment #10)
> rpmlint is silent, no problems.  So fix the BuildRequires and I think we're in
> business.  I just have to lookup how to sponsor you.

You don't have sponsor permissions.  The list of sponsors is here:

https://admin.fedora.redhat.com/accounts/dump-group.cgi?group=cvsextras&role_type=sponsor&format=html

I'm willing to sponsor this though.

Comment 12 David Nielsen 2006-04-14 15:15:06 UTC
Updated.. hopefully this is the final go at this untill Chris releases 0.2 :)

Comment 13 Jesse Keating 2006-04-17 20:40:49 UTC
I have the fu to sponsor now, so David you'll need to go through the steps at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors to create your account so I
can sponsor it.

Also, the srpm you list isn't reachable, I did tests by using the upstream
tarball w/ your spec.  For prosperity you might want to resolve that.

Comment 14 David Nielsen 2006-04-17 20:59:23 UTC
My webhost seems to have been down for a brief period. sorry about that.

I'm having an issue with the user system, it has gotten in a state where on one
hand it doesn't know a user registered to david, yet claims that
one is already registered to that addy when I try to register again. 

Could someone please look at that?

Comment 15 Jesse Keating 2006-04-27 03:10:25 UTC
David isn't as interested in maintaining this anymore, so I've gone ahead and
pushed it through.  It should wind up in extras-development soon.

Comment 16 Paul Howarth 2006-04-27 11:42:29 UTC
(In reply to comment #15)
> David isn't as interested in maintaining this anymore, so I've gone ahead and
> pushed it through.  It should wind up in extras-development soon.

I see from owners.list that you've taken over ownership of this package yourself
(which is good). Reading the above, it could be interpreted as pushing through
an already-orphaned package (which wouldn't have been good).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.