Description of problem: The conformance test "[sig-cli] oc explain should contain proper spec+status for CRDs [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" fails on ROKS 4.5 due to no machine config operator. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ROKS 4.5 How reproducible: Deploy a ROKS 4.5 cluster without the machine config operator installed on it. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: fail [github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/cli/explain.go:358]: Unexpected error: <*errors.errorString | 0xc00041d000>: { s: "failed to explain [\"controllerconfigs\" \"--api-version=machineconfiguration.openshift.io/v1\"]: exit status 1", } failed to explain ["controllerconfigs" "--api-version=machineconfiguration.openshift.io/v1"]: exit status 1 occurred Expected results: Passed Additional info: This can be fixed by removing the machine-config-operator CRD from the cli test https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/377fde66c4409a793838082fdd843f044311e374/test/extended/cli/explain.go#L103-L107
> > This can be fixed by removing the machine-config-operator CRD from the cli > test > https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/ > 377fde66c4409a793838082fdd843f044311e374/test/extended/cli/explain.go#L103- > L107 This must be conditionalized I guess or we'll drop this check from any other platform right? also, is there a plan for ROKS to use the MCO or we're sure that doesn't happen and we can safely drop this MCO check for this platform?
I'm closing this as it's not an MCO bug afaict.
Didn't see that you responded. ROKS has no plan on supporting MCO at all
We should have a condition to check whether ROKS is being tested and skip the relevant CRD types.
Skipped properly in 4.8.0-0.nightly-2021-06-16-190035
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.8.2 bug fix and security update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:2438