Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok). Your package (python-pwntools) Fails To Install in Fedora 34: can't install python3-pwntools: - nothing provides (python3.9dist(unicorn) < 1.0.2~rc4 with python3.9dist(unicorn) >= 1.0.2~rc1) needed by python3-pwntools-4.2.1-1.fc34.noarch If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/rawhide-gating/multi-builds/ Thanks!
Hello, This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs). If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.
I just updated the unicorn and pwntools packages in Rawhide.
Fixed. Something did not like setup.py's 'unicorn>=1.0.2rc1,<1.0.2rc4.' I patched to use 'unicorn>=1.0.2rc1' instead. I would appreciate if someone could point out if 'unicorn>=1.0.2rc1,<1.0.2rc4' should have worked. Does the Fedora build process support this syntax?
Yes, it supports it "unicorn>=1.0.2rc1,<1.0.2rc4" means "(python3.9dist(unicorn) < 1.0.2~rc4 with python3.9dist(unicorn) >= 1.0.2~rc1)" exactly. Semantically, it is the same. We had 1.0.2rc4 which is *not* < 1.0.2rc4.
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days