Where is there a dependency on nedit? If an editor must be hardcoded, better use gvim or gedit, since they are in Core and can be considered "standard" in a sense.
I guess because it's a Motif based editor and as such fits "grace"'s graphical interface better than a "GTK" or a plain "X" toolkit application. Intelligible, no?
(In reply to comment #1) > I guess because it's a Motif based editor and as such fits "grace"'s > graphical interface better than a "GTK" or a plain "X" toolkit > application. Intelligible, no? Yes, that is the reason. I am considering reverting this to 'xterm -e vi' that is the default. :-) After all most of the users I know are not even aware of this feature. This requires extra work to use, since it is not the default.
Maybe xdg-open should be used instead? It seems to work for me. The only trouble is if people are not running xfce/kde/gnome and don't have /usr/bin/mimeopen installed since the browser will be used in that case ;-(
Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks. If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6, please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting the change. Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we are following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
This package has changed maintainer in the Fedora. Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.
FEDORA-2021-e5c2c31d64 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e5c2c31d64
FEDORA-2021-e5c2c31d64 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-e5c2c31d64` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e5c2c31d64 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-f1ae9a951d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-f1ae9a951d` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f1ae9a951d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-e5c2c31d64 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2021-f1ae9a951d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.