Bug 1894573 - Rebase libmodulemd to >= 2.12.0
Summary: Rebase libmodulemd to >= 2.12.0
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libmodulemd
Version: 8.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: beta
: 8.5
Assignee: Petr Pisar
QA Contact: Jan Blazek
Mariya Pershina
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1955473
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-11-04 14:28 UTC by amatej
Modified: 2021-11-10 08:14 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: libmodulemd-2.12.1-1.el8
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.`libmodulemd` rebased to version 2.12.1 The `libmodulemd` packages have been rebased to version 2.12.1. Notable changes include: * Added support for version 1 of the `modulemd-obsoletes` document type, which provides information about a stream obsoleting another one, or a stream reaching its end of life. * Added support for version 3 of the `modulemd-packager` document type, which provides a packager description of a module stream content for a module build system. * Added support for the `static_context` attribute of the version 2 `modulemd` document type. With that, a module context is now defined by a packager instead of being generated by a module build system. * Now, a module stream value is always serialized as a quoted string.
Clone Of:
: 1955473 1956346 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-11-09 19:40:51 UTC
Type: ---
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2021:4405 0 None None None 2021-11-09 19:40:58 UTC

Internal Links: 1959874

Description amatej 2020-11-04 14:28:31 UTC 
LIBMODULEMD is a library that is tightly bound with DNF and LIBDNF. Support for the new metadata document: modulemd-obsoletes is needed by lidnf.
Comment 1 Stephen Gallagher 2021-01-27 14:54:21 UTC 
We will actually require at least version 2.12.0 in order to support the new PackagerV3 format used by MBS. Updating summary.
Comment 4 Petr Pisar 2021-04-28 14:17:22 UTC 
Ales, if this libmodulemd feature is required for a new dnf, could you please link a relevant dnf bug in Blocks list?
Comment 5 amatej 2021-04-29 11:29:56 UTC 
I think there is no such bug at this point and we ended up not needing the new libmodulemd in 8.4 and possibly won't need it in 8.5 either.

But since I am not fully certain I would keep this open for now.
Comment 6 Petr Pisar 2021-04-29 13:34:30 UTC 
Moving to 8.5.0.
Comment 20 errata-xmlrpc 2021-11-09 19:40:51 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (libmodulemd bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2021:4405
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.