Bug 1896399 - Policy Standards, Categories and Controls value listing is not consistent across pages
Summary: Policy Standards, Categories and Controls value listing is not consistent acr...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Classification: Red Hat
Component: GRC & Policy
Version: rhacm-2.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
: rhacm-2.1.3
Assignee: Yu Cao
QA Contact: Derek Ho
Mikela Dockery
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-11-10 13:27 UTC by Karel Srot
Modified: 2021-04-09 17:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: rhacm-2.1.3
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-02-17 18:19:07 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
gghezzo: rhacm-2.1.z+


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github open-cluster-management backlog issues 6954 0 None None None 2021-02-22 14:34:23 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2021:0607 0 None None None 2021-02-17 18:19:24 UTC

Description Karel Srot 2020-11-10 13:27:01 UTC
Description of problem:
multicloud/policies/all is not consistent in how NIST-CSF Standard is listed.

When creating a policy there is an option to use 'NIST-CSF' standard.
However at the policy listing (multicloud/policies/all) page the standard is listed as 'NIST CSF' (space instead of dash).
When listing policy details, 'NIST-CSF' is used again.

Since NIST-CSF is also listed in YAML, I would propose to use this instead of 'NIST CSF' at the policy listing page.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.1.0


Aditional info:
Please make it consistent, it complicates test case writing unnecessarily.

Comment 1 Karel Srot 2020-11-10 13:46:45 UTC
The same applies to 'PR.DS Data Security' category and 'PR.DS-2 Data-in-transit' Control that are listed as 'PR DS Data Security' and 'PR DS 2 Data In Transit'.

Comment 2 Karel Srot 2020-11-10 13:56:38 UTC
And also notice the different letter case between PR DS 2 Data In Transit' and 'PR.DS-2 Data-in-transit'.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2021-02-17 18:19:07 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management 2.1.3 security and bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0607


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.