Bug 189696 - update netinet/tcp.h to match current kernel features
Summary: update netinet/tcp.h to match current kernel features
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: glibc
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 245708
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-04-23 10:47 UTC by Sami Farin
Modified: 2008-03-30 06:37 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-03-30 06:37:55 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
update to netinet/tcp.h (669 bytes, patch)
2006-04-23 10:47 UTC, Sami Farin 		no flags Details | Diff
View All

Description Sami Farin 2006-04-23 10:47:52 UTC 
Description of problem:
netinet/tcp.h out of date

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
glibc-headers-2.4-5

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. #include <netinet/tcp.h>
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
tcpi_rcv_rtt and other bits not defined, resulting into compilation failures.

Expected results:
successful compile.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Sami Farin 2006-04-23 10:47:52 UTC 
Created attachment 128129 [details]
update to netinet/tcp.h
Comment 2 Sami Farin 2007-09-20 10:12:59 UTC 
Now there's also
#define TCP_MD5SIG       14     /* TCP MD5 Signature (RFC2385) */
so my 1.5 years old patch needs to be updated.  I can do it if you are too busy.
Comment 3 Ulrich Drepper 2007-10-05 18:56:11 UTC 
I've updated the upstream version.
Comment 4 Terje Røsten 2007-10-11 19:04:09 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> I've updated the upstream version.

Which break some builds:

 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=191584&name=build.log

Reverting to tcp.h from F-7 is fixing the problem here.

$ rpm -q glibc-headers
glibc-headers-2.6.90-18

Where is the bug tgt or glibc-headers?

Should I open a new bug report?
Comment 5 Ulrich Drepper 2007-10-11 19:10:52 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Should I open a new bug report?

No, it's already fixed.
Comment 6 Terje Røsten 2007-10-11 19:19:14 UTC 
Ok, thanks for quick fix.
Comment 7 Ulrich Drepper 2008-03-30 06:37:55 UTC 
This is at least fixed in rawhide.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.