Version-Release number of selected component: rpm-4.16.0-1.fc33 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.14.0 backtrace_rating: 4 cgroup: 0::/system.slice/system-dbus\x2d:1.12\x2dorg.fedoraproject.Setroubleshootd.slice/dbus-:1.12-org.fedoraproject.Setroubleshootd cmdline: rpm -ql filesystem crash_function: db_create executable: /usr/bin/rpm journald_cursor: s=3020762baaaa43a79388f7b53a2b6e3c;i=dbb8f;b=d403cebf5ec64f2b9f0eb9b1108459db;m=88c4d6;t=5b41940c84c0f;x=f4826ff908999940 kernel: 5.8.18-300.fc33.x86_64 rootdir: / runlevel: unknown type: CCpp uid: 971 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #0 db_create at ../../src/db/db_method.c:122 #1 db3_dbiOpen at backend/db3.c:854 #2 dbiOpen at backend/dbi.c:155 #3 indexOpen at rpmdb.c:192 #4 doOpen at rpmdb.c:358 #5 openDatabase at rpmdb.c:517 #6 rpmdbOpen at rpmdb.c:546 #7 rpmtsOpenDB at rpmts.c:98 #8 rpmtsInitIterator at rpmts.c:183 #9 loadKeyringFromDB at rpmts.c:326
Created attachment 1729857 [details] File: backtrace
Created attachment 1729858 [details] File: core_backtrace
Created attachment 1729859 [details] File: cpuinfo
Created attachment 1729860 [details] File: dso_list
Created attachment 1729861 [details] File: environ
Created attachment 1729862 [details] File: exploitable
Created attachment 1729863 [details] File: limits
Created attachment 1729864 [details] File: maps
Created attachment 1729865 [details] File: mountinfo
Created attachment 1729866 [details] File: open_fds
Created attachment 1729867 [details] File: proc_pid_status
Created attachment 1729868 [details] File: var_log_messages
*** Bug 1898301 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
> --Nov 15 00:10:37 philxps setroubleshootd[2185]: warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb backend. > Nov 15 00:10:37 philxps setroubleshootd[2185]: error: cannot open Packages index using bdb - Permission denied (13) > Nov 15 00:10:38 philxps setroubleshootd[2900]: warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb backend. > Nov 15 00:10:38 philxps setroubleshootd[2900]: error: cannot open Packages index using bdb - Permission denied (13) > Nov 15 00:10:40 philxps setroubleshootd[6481]: warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb backend. > Nov 15 00:10:40 philxps setroubleshootd[6481]: error: cannot open Packages index using bdb - Permission denied (13) -- This is a side-effect of bug 1461313. Update to selinux-policy-3.14.6-30.fc33, run 'restorecon -Rv /var/lib/rpm' and then 'rpmdb --rebuilddb' to finish it all off. Killed by SIGBUS is an actual bug in either rpm or bdb, but unless there's something more to this, there's not much incentive in chasing and fixing something that is just about to be axed for good. Leaving open for the time being though.
Hmm, I just noticed this is filed as a private bug, guess abrt defaults to that. Are you okay with okay with opening the access to this bug, so people can see what the deal is and duplicates can be properly collected?
(In reply to Panu Matilainen from comment #15) > Hmm, I just noticed this is filed as a private bug, guess abrt defaults to > that. > > Are you okay with okay with opening the access to this bug, so people can > see what the deal is and duplicates can be properly collected? I thought the reference in comment 13: <quote>Duplicate of this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898301</quote> serves this purpose, so there is no need to open this up? That bugreport seems to be closed (in the meantime?) it seems? But if you insist go ahead. I don't remember why I chose to restrict access in this case, I don't find anything sensitive at quick glance.
(In reply to Philipp Raich from comment #16) > (In reply to Panu Matilainen from comment #15) > > Hmm, I just noticed this is filed as a private bug, guess abrt defaults to > > that. > > > > Are you okay with okay with opening the access to this bug, so people can > > see what the deal is and duplicates can be properly collected? > > I thought the reference in comment 13: <quote>Duplicate of this bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898301</quote> serves this > purpose, so there is no need to open this up? > That bugreport seems to be closed (in the meantime?) it seems? > > But if you insist go ahead. I don't remember why I chose to restrict access > in this case, I don't find anything sensitive at quick glance. Oh, the point is that there are several other duplicates from other people, and accumulating. It seems that abrt is filing them all as closed by default. To be on the safe side I suppose, which is probably reasonable from privacy point of view, but a bit of a PITA from bug-keeping POV. So with your approval, opening this so I can close the others as dupes of this. Thanks!
*** Bug 1900407 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 1902395 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
FEDORA-2020-b587a31a29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b587a31a29
FEDORA-2020-b587a31a29 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-b587a31a29` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b587a31a29 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2020-b587a31a29 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.