Bug 189945 - yum doesn't install i386 packages when no x86_64 present on extras
Summary: yum doesn't install i386 packages when no x86_64 present on extras
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: yum
Version: 5
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jeremy Katz
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-04-26 00:21 UTC by Phil Wirtz
Modified: 2014-01-21 22:54 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-04-26 16:58:50 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Phil Wirtz 2006-04-26 00:21:21 UTC 
Description of problem: both uqm and SDL_image (i386)pkgs are not seen for
installation


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable
SDL_image-1.2.4-5.fc5.i386.rpm
uqm-0.5.0-1.fc5.i386.rpm
yum-2.6.0-1

How reproducible:consistent


Steps to Reproduce:
1.yum install (uqm or SDL_image)
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Parsing package install arguments
No Match for argument: (uqm or SDL_image)
Nothing to do



Expected results:install pkgs with deps


Additional info:bug reports 189939 for uqm pkg, 189944 for SDL_image
SDL-1.2.9-5.2.1.i386.rpm from core repository installed without problem
Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2006-04-26 16:58:50 UTC 
i386 packages aren't generally included in the x86_64 extras repos.
Comment 2 Phil Wirtz 2006-04-27 22:07:54 UTC 
but you do in core
Comment 3 Phil Wirtz 2006-04-27 22:17:26 UTC 
basically I would rather have a package that works even if it is the wrong
specifc arch than an exact arch package that doesn't work. Update when the exact
arch works.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.