Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/caps.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/caps-0.3.0-1.src.rpm Description: caps, the C Audio Plugin Suite, is a collection of highly refined LADSPA units capable of (and intended for) realtime operation. The suite includes DSP units emulating instrument amplifiers, stomp-box classics, versatile 'virtual analogue' oscillators, fractal oscillation, reverb, equalization and others.
I stripped caps.so, and I could still use it in sweep. So, is the patch really necessary?
Updated bits... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/caps.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/FC5/caps-0.3.0-2.src.rpm This just adds a patch to give the installed .so files execute permission.
Without running any special script on the rpm, three orphaned directories can be spotted due to missing ownership or missing dependencies: /usr/lib/ladspa/ /usr/share/ladspa/ /usr/share/ladspa/rdf/ $ rpm -qpR /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/caps-0.3.0-2.i386.rpm | grep lad $ rpmls -p /home/misc5/tmp/rpm/RPMS/caps-0.3.0-2.i386.rpm -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/ladspa/caps.so drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0 -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/CHANGES -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/COPYING -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/README -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/README.ardour -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/README.dist -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/caps-0.3.0.pdf -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/caps-0.3.0/caps.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/ladspa/rdf/caps.rdf
(In reply to comment #3) > Without running any special script on the rpm, three orphaned > directories can be spotted due to missing ownership or missing > dependencies: > > /usr/lib/ladspa/ > /usr/share/ladspa/ > /usr/share/ladspa/rdf/ So should ladspa own /usr/lib/ladspa, /usr/share/ladspa and liblrdf own /usr/share/ladspa/rdf? This package could require those packages. The only weird thing is that apart from these directories, there are no other runtime dependencies on those things.
Would be nice to rename this to ladspa-caps-plugins Thanks,
(In reply to comment #4) > So should ladspa own /usr/lib/ladspa, ladspa does own /usr/lib/ladspa > /usr/share/ladspa this should also be owned ladspa > and liblrdf own > /usr/share/ladspa/rdf? No, also to the ladspa package Maybe file a bug against ladspa, with a reference to this bug. > This package could require those packages. The only > weird thing is that apart from these directories, there are no other runtime > dependencies on those things. I think it is not reasonable for ladspa-caps-plugins to require ladspa. True, it doesn't really depend on it, but gives a certain consistency.
(In reply to comment #7) > I think it is not reasonable for ladspa-caps-plugins to require ladspa. I meant of course: not unreasonable
(In reply to comment #7) > > /usr/share/ladspa > this should also be owned ladspa > > and liblrdf own > > /usr/share/ladspa/rdf? > No, also to the ladspa package > Maybe file a bug against ladspa, with a reference to this bug. Done. See bug 231706.
I've renamed the package and s Required ladspa. New SRPM here: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/ladspa-caps-plugins-0.3.0-3.src.rpm
I downloaded the above package, but all I get is: > rpm -ivh ladspa-caps-plugins-0.3.0-3.src.rpm ladspa-caps-plugins-0.3.0-3.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest): I have no idea what ladspa is but I'm trying to give at least some review to these very old tickets.
Actually the linked "src.rpm" is nearly 500K of nulls.
(In reply to comment #12) > Actually the linked "src.rpm" is nearly 500K of nulls. > Fixed. Please try again. Thanks!
This fails to build for me: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/caps-0.3.0-3.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/ladspa/*.so error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/ladspa/caps.so I think this comes from %install where "/usr" is passed explicitly, even on x86-64.
I'm closing this. Somebody else submitted it and got it accepted.