Hide Forgot
python-testfixtures fails to build with Python 3.10.0a2. =================================== FAILURES =================================== _____________________ Tests.test_invalid_communicate_call ______________________ self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_communicate_call> def test_invalid_communicate_call(self): Popen = MockPopen() Popen.set_command('bar') process = Popen('bar') with ShouldRaise(TypeError( "communicate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'" )): > process.communicate(foo='bar') testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:501: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopenInstance object at 0x7efdc57f1820> args = (), kw = {'foo': 'bar'} @wraps(func) def recorder(self, *args, **kw): self._record((func.__name__,), *args, **kw) > return func(self, *args, **kw) E TypeError: MockPopenInstance.communicate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo' testfixtures/popen.py:43: TypeError During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_communicate_call> def test_invalid_communicate_call(self): Popen = MockPopen() Popen.set_command('bar') process = Popen('bar') with ShouldRaise(TypeError( "communicate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'" )): > process.communicate(foo='bar') E AssertionError: TypeError("communicate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (expected) != TypeError("MockPopenInstance.communicate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (raised) testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:501: AssertionError ___________________________ Tests.test_invalid_kill ____________________________ self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_kill> def test_invalid_kill(self): Popen = MockPopen() Popen.set_command('bar') process = Popen('bar') if PY2: text = 'kill() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)' else: text = 'kill() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given' with ShouldRaise(TypeError(text)): > process.kill('moo') testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:539: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopenInstance object at 0x7efdc584d100> args = ('moo',), kw = {} @wraps(func) def recorder(self, *args, **kw): self._record((func.__name__,), *args, **kw) > return func(self, *args, **kw) E TypeError: MockPopenInstance.kill() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given testfixtures/popen.py:43: TypeError During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_kill> def test_invalid_kill(self): Popen = MockPopen() Popen.set_command('bar') process = Popen('bar') if PY2: text = 'kill() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)' else: text = 'kill() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given' with ShouldRaise(TypeError(text)): > process.kill('moo') E AssertionError: TypeError('kill() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given') (expected) != TypeError('MockPopenInstance.kill() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given') (raised) testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:539: AssertionError ________________________ Tests.test_invalid_parameters _________________________ self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_parameters> def test_invalid_parameters(self): Popen = MockPopen() with ShouldRaise(TypeError( "__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'" )): > Popen(foo='bar') testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:478: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopen object at 0x7efdc56d98b0>, args = () kw = {'foo': 'bar'}, root_call = call.Popen(foo='bar') def __call__(self, *args, **kw): self.mock.Popen(*args, **kw) root_call = call.Popen(*args, **kw) self.all_calls.append(root_call) > return MockPopenInstance(self, root_call, *args, **kw) E TypeError: MockPopenInstance.__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo' testfixtures/popen.py:257: TypeError During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_parameters> def test_invalid_parameters(self): Popen = MockPopen() with ShouldRaise(TypeError( "__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'" )): > Popen(foo='bar') E AssertionError: TypeError("__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (expected) != TypeError("MockPopenInstance.__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (raised) testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:478: AssertionError ___________________________ Tests.test_invalid_poll ____________________________ self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_poll> def test_invalid_poll(self): Popen = MockPopen() Popen.set_command('bar') process = Popen('bar') if PY2: text = 'poll() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)' else: text = 'poll() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given' with ShouldRaise(TypeError(text)): > process.poll('moo') testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:550: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopenInstance object at 0x7efdc57aa2e0> args = ('moo',), kw = {} @wraps(func) def recorder(self, *args, **kw): self._record((func.__name__,), *args, **kw) > return func(self, *args, **kw) E TypeError: MockPopenInstance.poll() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given testfixtures/popen.py:43: TypeError During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_poll> def test_invalid_poll(self): Popen = MockPopen() Popen.set_command('bar') process = Popen('bar') if PY2: text = 'poll() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)' else: text = 'poll() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given' with ShouldRaise(TypeError(text)): > process.poll('moo') E AssertionError: TypeError('poll() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given') (expected) != TypeError('MockPopenInstance.poll() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given') (raised) testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:550: AssertionError ________________________ Tests.test_invalid_send_signal ________________________ self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_send_signal> def test_invalid_send_signal(self): Popen = MockPopen() Popen.set_command('bar') process = Popen('bar') with ShouldRaise(TypeError( "send_signal() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'" )): > process.send_signal(foo='bar') testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:519: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopenInstance object at 0x7efdc57abc10> args = (), kw = {'foo': 'bar'} @wraps(func) def recorder(self, *args, **kw): self._record((func.__name__,), *args, **kw) > return func(self, *args, **kw) E TypeError: MockPopenInstance.send_signal() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo' testfixtures/popen.py:43: TypeError During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_send_signal> def test_invalid_send_signal(self): Popen = MockPopen() Popen.set_command('bar') process = Popen('bar') with ShouldRaise(TypeError( "send_signal() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'" )): > process.send_signal(foo='bar') E AssertionError: TypeError("send_signal() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (expected) != TypeError("MockPopenInstance.send_signal() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (raised) testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:519: AssertionError _________________________ Tests.test_invalid_terminate _________________________ self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_terminate> def test_invalid_terminate(self): Popen = MockPopen() Popen.set_command('bar') process = Popen('bar') with ShouldRaise(TypeError( "terminate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'" )): > process.terminate(foo='bar') testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:528: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopenInstance object at 0x7efdc56a49a0> args = (), kw = {'foo': 'bar'} @wraps(func) def recorder(self, *args, **kw): self._record((func.__name__,), *args, **kw) > return func(self, *args, **kw) E TypeError: MockPopenInstance.terminate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo' testfixtures/popen.py:43: TypeError During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_terminate> def test_invalid_terminate(self): Popen = MockPopen() Popen.set_command('bar') process = Popen('bar') with ShouldRaise(TypeError( "terminate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'" )): > process.terminate(foo='bar') E AssertionError: TypeError("terminate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (expected) != TypeError("MockPopenInstance.terminate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (raised) testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:528: AssertionError _________________________ Tests.test_invalid_wait_call _________________________ self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_wait_call> def test_invalid_wait_call(self): Popen = MockPopen() Popen.set_command('bar') process = Popen('bar') with ShouldRaise(TypeError( "wait() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'" )): > process.wait(foo='bar') testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:510: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopenInstance object at 0x7efdc56a8790> args = (), kw = {'foo': 'bar'} @wraps(func) def recorder(self, *args, **kw): self._record((func.__name__,), *args, **kw) > return func(self, *args, **kw) E TypeError: MockPopenInstance.wait() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo' testfixtures/popen.py:43: TypeError During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_wait_call> def test_invalid_wait_call(self): Popen = MockPopen() Popen.set_command('bar') process = Popen('bar') with ShouldRaise(TypeError( "wait() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'" )): > process.wait(foo='bar') E AssertionError: TypeError("wait() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (expected) != TypeError("MockPopenInstance.wait() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (raised) testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:510: AssertionError =============================== warnings summary =============================== /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/_pytest/config/__init__.py:1148 /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/_pytest/config/__init__.py:1148: PytestConfigWarning: Unknown config ini key: django_settings_module self._warn_or_fail_if_strict("Unknown config ini key: {}\n".format(key)) -- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/warnings.html =========================== short test summary info ============================ FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_communicate_call FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_kill - Assertion... FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_parameters - Ass... FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_poll - Assertion... FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_send_signal - As... FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_terminate - Asse... FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_wait_call - Asse... ============ 7 failed, 721 passed, 3 deselected, 1 warning in 3.31s ============ error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SqpxEv (%check) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SqpxEv (%check) For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.10/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01773441-python-testfixtures/ For all our attempts to build python-testfixtures with Python 3.10, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.10/package/python-testfixtures/ Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.10: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.10/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.10 will be included in Fedora 35. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with early pre-releases of Python 3.10. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.
Hello, is there any update on this? It blocks us from testing other packages (python-prawcore, python-praw) with Python 3.10. Thank you.
It might be easier to make python-prawcore use pytest's logging capture, and drop the dependency on testfixtures.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 34 development cycle. Changing version to 34.
This is a mass-posted update. Sorry if it is not 100% accurate to this bugzilla. The Python 3.10 rebuild is in progress in a Koji side tag. If you manage to fix the problem, please commit the fix in the rawhide branch, but don't build the package in regular rawhide. You can either build the package in the side tag, with: $ fedpkg build --target=f35-python Or you can the build and we will eventually build it for you. Note that the rebuild is still in progress, so not all (build) dependencies of this package might be available right away. Thanks. See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.10 If you have general questions about the rebuild, please use this mailing list thread: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/G47SGOYIQLRDTWGOSLSWERZSSHXDEDH5/
The f35-python side tag has been merged to Rawhide. From now on, build as you would normally build.
*** Bug 1969156 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Hello, This is the second reminder (step 4 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs). If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.
Dear Maintainer, your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 35. Action is required from you. If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report. Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2021-01-18). A week before the mass branching of Fedora 36 according to the schedule [3], any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 34 will be retired regardless of the status of this bug. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ [3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html
This package has been orphaned. You can pick it up at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-testfixtures by clicking button "Take". If nobody picks it up, it will be retired and removed from a distribution.
Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok@redhat.com). All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 35. Thanks for taking care of it!