Bug 190231 - Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation
Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jason Tibbitts
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT 190233
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2006-04-28 22:47 UTC by Jose Pedro Oliveira
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-04-29 17:04:09 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jose Pedro Oliveira 2006-04-28 22:47:12 UTC
Spec URL:


This class implements a complete RFC 2822 parser that locates email
addresses in strings and returns a list of "Email::Address" objects
found. Alternatley you may construct objects manually. The goal of this
software is to be correct, and very very fast.

Note: Will be required by http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Recorder/

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-04-29 00:17:45 UTC
Not much to say...

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and
follows the Perl template.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible. It's not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it.
* source files match upstream:
   b57726d9915a502bc6b52966217a453e  Email-Address-1.80.tar.gz
   b57726d9915a502bc6b52966217a453e  Email-Address-1.80.tar.gz-srpm
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directory it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=1, Tests=873,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.14 cusr +  0.02 csys =  0.16 CPU)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.


Comment 2 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2006-04-29 17:04:09 UTC
Thanks for the review.

Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.