RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1902887 - Missing conditionals for "--without libarchive"
Summary: Missing conditionals for "--without libarchive"
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rpm
Version: 8.3
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.4
Assignee: Michal Domonkos
QA Contact: Eva Mrakova
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-11-30 22:38 UTC by Robert Scheck
Modified: 2021-05-18 14:50 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version: rpm-4.14.3-13.el8
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-18 14:49:53 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Robert Scheck 2020-11-30 22:38:02 UTC
Description of problem:
It seems like the conditionals for "--without libarchive" are missing in the spec file, because at least building with "--without libarchive" leads to build failures.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rpm-4.14.3-4.el8

How reproducible:
Everytime with "--without libarchive" options at build-time.

Actual results:
--- 8< ---
--- rpm.spec
+++ rpm.spec.rsc
@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ done;
     %{?with_lmdb: --enable-lmdb} \
     --enable-python \
     --with-crypto=openssl \
+    %{!?with_libarchive: --without-archive} \
     PYTHON=python3
 
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
@@ -531,7 +532,9 @@ make check || cat tests/rpmtests.log
 %attr(0644, root, root) %verify(not md5 size mtime) %ghost %config(missingok,noreplace) /var/lib/rpm/*
 
 %{_bindir}/rpm
+%if %{with libarchive}
 %{_bindir}/rpm2archive
+%endif # with libarchive
 %{_bindir}/rpm2cpio
 %{_bindir}/rpmdb
 %{_bindir}/rpmkeys
--- 8< ---

Expected results:
Above patch or better being applied to rpm.spec

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2021-05-18 14:49:53 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (rpm bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:1606


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.