Bug 1904070
| Summary: | Operator with webhooks fail to deploy on 4.5, works on master | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Alexander Greene <agreene> | |
| Component: | OLM | Assignee: | Nick Hale <nhale> | |
| OLM sub component: | OLM | QA Contact: | Jian Zhang <jiazha> | |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | Docs Contact: | ||
| Severity: | medium | |||
| Priority: | medium | CC: | abays, dageoffr, dsover, mschuppe | |
| Version: | 4.5 | |||
| Target Milestone: | --- | |||
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1921000 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-01-26 20:28:30 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1921000 | |||
|
Description
Alexander Greene
2020-12-03 13:18:41 UTC
I am experiencing something similar when trying to deploy my team's operator against 4.6.12. We were forced to use operator-sdk 1.1.0 because 1.2.0+ produced a validation error when calling the "create webhook" command:
# operator-sdk create webhook --group osp-director --version v1beta1 --kind BaremetalSet --programmatic-validation
...
FATA[0000] failed to create webhook with version "3-alpha": operator-sdk create webhook requires an api with the group, kind and version provided
Anyhow, once the scaffolding is created within the operator, I modified the "config" directory and its subdirectories to include webhook and cert-manager content. I created my image, index and bundle and push them to quay. When I deploy the operator via OLM, the controller manager pod gets stuck in ContainerCreating with the "Error: cannot find volume 'apiservice-cert' to mount into container 'manager'" error. I can manually create the secret before deploying the operator to work around this issue, but then I notice some other peculiarities. The pod deploys just fine, but no actual ValidatingWebhookConfiguration (which happens to be the type of webhook I am trying to deploy) is created in my cluster. I look at the CSV for the operator, and I do indeed see the webhook represented there:
# oc get csv osp-director-operator.v0.0.1 -o json | jq -r '.spec.webhookdefinitions'
[
{
"admissionReviewVersions": [
"v1beta1"
],
"deploymentName": "osp-director-operator-controller-manager",
"failurePolicy": "Fail",
"generateName": "vbaremetalset.kb.io",
"rules": [
{
"apiGroups": [
"osp-director.openstack.org"
],
"apiVersions": [
"v1beta1"
],
"operations": [
"CREATE",
"UPDATE"
],
"resources": [
"baremetalsets"
]
}
],
"sideEffects": "None",
"type": "ValidatingAdmissionWebhook",
"webhookPath": "/validate-osp-director-openstack-org-v1beta1-baremetalset"
}
]
Yet, it is not present:
# oc get validatingwebhookconfiguration | grep vbaremetalset
#
Also, it seems OLM is creating the webhook service for me, but the port spec is wrong:
# oc get svc osp-director-operator-controller-manager-service -o yaml
...
spec:
clusterIP: 172.30.222.94
ports:
- name: "443"
port: 443
protocol: TCP
targetPort: 443 <---- should be 9443
...
Yet the deployment spec in the CSV has the right port value:
# oc get deployments osp-director-operator-controller-manager -o yaml
...
command:
- /manager
image: quay.io/abays/osp-director-operator:0.0.1
imagePullPolicy: Always
name: manager
ports:
- containerPort: 9443
name: webhook-server
protocol: TCP
...
Any pointers or insights in regards to what might be going on would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Hi Andrew, This bug (referring to the mount issues) is a duplicate of another low-priority bug that hasn't and will not be patched in 4.6. Check out this comment for some more details: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920665#c1 The port issue looks unique -- please open fresh BZ so we can focus on it directly. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1920665 *** |