Bug 1904386 - lmdb 1.0.0 is available
Summary: lmdb 1.0.0 is available
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-lmdb
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Petr Špaček
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1903075 1958897
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-12-04 09:38 UTC by Petr Viktorin (pviktori)
Modified: 2021-05-12 13:08 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-lmdb-1.0.0-1.fc35
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-12 13:08:18 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Petr Viktorin (pviktori) 2020-12-04 09:38:53 UTC
lmdb 1.0.0 is available: https://pypi.org/project/lmdb/
Could it be added to Rawhide?

Updating to a new version will solve an incompatibility between python-zarr and Python 3.10; see BZ#1903075

I've opened a pull request for the update here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-lmdb/pull-request/1

Comment 1 Petr Viktorin (pviktori) 2020-12-04 09:47:23 UTC
Also, it seems that monitoring for new releases is disabled. I recommend turning on "Monitoring status" in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-lmdb

And, if you'd like to empower more people to handle things like this, you could add the python-sig group at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-lmdb/settings#usersgroups-tab

Comment 2 Ben Cotton 2021-02-09 15:31:53 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 34 development cycle.
Changing version to 34.

Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2021-05-12 08:07:57 UTC
Petr, are you receiving?

Comment 4 Petr Špaček 2021-05-12 10:44:24 UTC
Apologies, e-mails about this got lost when I recently changed jobs. Looking now.

Comment 5 Petr Špaček 2021-05-12 11:00:47 UTC
First, I've added @pviktori and @mhroncok as python-lmdb admins in Pagure to make sure I'm not bottleneck.

Second, it's a big jump and I do not have time to test it myself properly. Can one of you do the update with due diligence?

Thanks and sorry once again for the huge lag.

Comment 6 Miro Hrončok 2021-05-12 11:23:04 UTC
Thanks. I am not interested in maintaining this package, but I've added @python-sig instead.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.