Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
Subtest java.pl fails in the self-test.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
crypto-policies-20200713-1.git51d1222.el8
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Build the source rpm and run make check.
Actual results:
tests/java.pl
Java ciphersuites per policy
Checking the Java configuration
Checking policy DEFAULT
Exception in thread "main" java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: Default SSLContext not available
at sun.security.jca.GetInstance.getInstance(GetInstance.java:159)
at javax.net.ssl.SSLContext.getInstance(SSLContext.java:156)
at javax.net.ssl.SSLContext.getDefault(SSLContext.java:96)
at CipherList.main(CipherList.java:10)
Could not find TLS_EMPTY_RENEGOTIATION_INFO_SCSV in DEFAULT
make[1]: *** [Makefile:47: check] Error 1
Expected results:
Passed test.
Additional info:
FYI, default ciphers in openjdk changed. It was working in 8.3.
Comment 1Andrew John Hughes
2020-12-14 19:41:25 UTC
You don't seem to list the Java version above, but from IRC, it was java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.272.b06-0.1.el8
8u272 introduced a new TLS stack, with TLSv1.3 support: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8245468
I had a look at the test. CipherList.java looks like:
import java.net.URL;
import java.io.*;
import javax.net.ssl.*;
public class CipherList
{
public static void main(String[] args)
throws Exception
{
SSLContext context = SSLContext.getDefault();
int i;
SSLSocketFactory sf = context.getSocketFactory();
String[] cipherSuites = sf.getDefaultCipherSuites();
for (i=0;i<cipherSuites.length;i++)
{
System.out.println(cipherSuites[i]);
}
System.exit(0);
}
}
And it's failing at line 10, which is this:
SSLContext context = SSLContext.getDefault();
with:
Exception in thread "main" java.security.NoSuchAlgorithmException: Default SSLContext not available
at sun.security.jca.GetInstance.getInstance(GetInstance.java:159)
at javax.net.ssl.SSLContext.getInstance(SSLContext.java:156)
at javax.net.ssl.SSLContext.getDefault(SSLContext.java:96)
at CipherList.main(CipherList.java:10)
Note that this output is a red herring:
Could not find TLS_EMPTY_RENEGOTIATION_INFO_SCSV in DEFAULT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory (java-1.8.0-openjdk bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:1795