RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1908250 - Expose reading and writing LVB in the python bindings
Summary: Expose reading and writing LVB in the python bindings
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sanlock
Version: 8.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.4
Assignee: David Teigland
QA Contact: cluster-qe@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1920150
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-12-16 08:26 UTC by Benny Zlotnik
Modified: 2021-09-07 11:58 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: sanlock-3.8.3-1.el8
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1920150 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-18 15:09:01 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1906074 0 unspecified CLOSED [RFE] Support disks copy between regular and managed block storage domains 2022-07-25 17:00:26 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2021:1711 0 None None None 2021-05-18 15:09:17 UTC

Description Benny Zlotnik 2020-12-16 08:26:27 UTC 
Description of problem:
Vdsm needs to use get/set_lvb in order for RHV to support copying of images not managed by Vdsm, like Managed Block Storage volumes.

Support in the bindings was added in the following patchset[1]

[1] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sanlock-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org/thread/ZFKKAHPBZCIJ5ZF45X5IV7ILK7AIMXYQ/



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 2 David Teigland 2021-01-06 16:10:26 UTC 
This needs a qa ack from RHV QA to be approved for 8.4 first, then we can look at 8.3.z.
Comment 3 Benny Zlotnik 2021-01-20 13:00:02 UTC 
Avihai, will your team be able to approve this? The verification is simple as we already have test that use the actual daemon

Otherwise, I can verify it myself, as this does not change any behavior in sanlock, it only adds new bindings which need to be used by vdsm
Comment 4 Avihai 2021-01-25 12:03:26 UTC 
(In reply to Benny Zlotnik from comment #3)
> Avihai, will your team be able to approve this? The verification is simple
> as we already have test that use the actual daemon
> 
> Otherwise, I can verify it myself, as this does not change any behavior in
> sanlock, it only adds new bindings which need to be used by vdsm
Comment 5 Tal Nisan 2021-01-25 14:31:55 UTC 
Basically the added functionality is a new one, on QE side what is needed to verify is that there are no regressions in the old functionality while the new functionality will be verified along with the new RFE addition to MBS
Comment 6 Avihai 2021-01-25 14:46:47 UTC 
(In reply to David Teigland from comment #2)
> This needs a qa ack from RHV QA to be approved for 8.4 first, then we can
> look at 8.3.z.

ACK from RHV QA granted :)
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2021-05-18 15:09:01 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (sanlock bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:1711
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.