Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
User can add a route rule without priority, after that, nmstate or NM will write the real priority into NM connection. When apply again, nmstate will regard it as another rule and cause a failure.
Notice when priority not mentioned, NM automatically sets it to 30000. I think we can follow this process.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nmstate-1.0.0-1.el8.noarch
nispor-1.0.1-2.el8.x86_64
NetworkManager-1.30.0-0.5.el8.x86_64
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
cat << EOF > rules.yaml
routes:
config:
- destination: 0.0.0.0/0
next-hop-address: 100.1.1.254
next-hop-interface: dummy0
table-id: 100
route-rules:
config:
- ip-from: 8.8.8.8/24
ip-to: 200.1.1.1/24
route-table: 100
interfaces:
- name: dummy0
type: dummy
state: up
ipv4:
enabled: true
address:
- ip: 100.1.1.1
prefix-length: 24
EOF
nmstatectl set rules.yaml # ok
nmstatectl set rules.yaml # failed
Actual results:
Failed at second applying
Expected results:
No failure
Additional info:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/nmstatectl", line 11, in <module>
load_entry_point('nmstate==1.0.0', 'console_scripts', 'nmstatectl')()
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nmstatectl/nmstatectl.py", line 70, in main
return args.func(args)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nmstatectl/nmstatectl.py", line 280, in apply
args.save_to_disk,
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nmstatectl/nmstatectl.py", line 309, in apply_state
save_to_disk=save_to_disk,
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/libnmstate/netapplier.py", line 71, in apply
_apply_ifaces_state(plugins, net_state, verify_change, save_to_disk)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/libnmstate/netapplier.py", line 115, in _apply_ifaces_state
_verify_change(plugins, net_state)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/libnmstate/netapplier.py", line 120, in _verify_change
net_state.verify(current_state)
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/libnmstate/net_state.py", line 67, in verify
self._route_rule.verify(current_state.get(RouteRule.KEY))
File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/libnmstate/route_rule.py", line 175, in verify
{RouteRule.KEY: {RouteRule.CONFIG: cur_rule_info}},
libnmstate.error.NmstateVerificationError:
desired
=======
---
route-rules:
config:
- ip-from: 8.8.8.0/24
ip-to: 200.1.1.0/24
route-table: 100
- ip-from: 8.8.8.0/24
ip-to: 200.1.1.0/24
priority: 30000
route-table: 100
- ip-from: 9.9.9.0/24
ip-to: ''
priority: 29999
route-table: 100
current
=======
---
route-rules:
config:
- ip-from: 8.8.8.0/24
ip-to: 200.1.1.0/24
priority: 30000
route-table: 100
- ip-from: 9.9.9.0/24
ip-to: ''
priority: 29999
route-table: 100
difference
==========
--- desired
+++ current
@@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
---
route-rules:
config:
- - ip-from: 8.8.8.0/24
- ip-to: 200.1.1.0/24
- route-table: 100
- ip-from: 8.8.8.0/24
ip-to: 200.1.1.0/24
priority: 30000
Comment 4Fernando F. Mancera
2022-01-11 20:31:56 UTC
This is fixed on nmstatectl-rust. Please verify this bug on nmstatectl-rust. Thank you!
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory (nmstate bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2022:1772
Description of problem: User can add a route rule without priority, after that, nmstate or NM will write the real priority into NM connection. When apply again, nmstate will regard it as another rule and cause a failure. Notice when priority not mentioned, NM automatically sets it to 30000. I think we can follow this process. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): nmstate-1.0.0-1.el8.noarch nispor-1.0.1-2.el8.x86_64 NetworkManager-1.30.0-0.5.el8.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: cat << EOF > rules.yaml routes: config: - destination: 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop-address: 100.1.1.254 next-hop-interface: dummy0 table-id: 100 route-rules: config: - ip-from: 8.8.8.8/24 ip-to: 200.1.1.1/24 route-table: 100 interfaces: - name: dummy0 type: dummy state: up ipv4: enabled: true address: - ip: 100.1.1.1 prefix-length: 24 EOF nmstatectl set rules.yaml # ok nmstatectl set rules.yaml # failed Actual results: Failed at second applying Expected results: No failure Additional info: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/nmstatectl", line 11, in <module> load_entry_point('nmstate==1.0.0', 'console_scripts', 'nmstatectl')() File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nmstatectl/nmstatectl.py", line 70, in main return args.func(args) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nmstatectl/nmstatectl.py", line 280, in apply args.save_to_disk, File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/nmstatectl/nmstatectl.py", line 309, in apply_state save_to_disk=save_to_disk, File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/libnmstate/netapplier.py", line 71, in apply _apply_ifaces_state(plugins, net_state, verify_change, save_to_disk) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/libnmstate/netapplier.py", line 115, in _apply_ifaces_state _verify_change(plugins, net_state) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/libnmstate/netapplier.py", line 120, in _verify_change net_state.verify(current_state) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/libnmstate/net_state.py", line 67, in verify self._route_rule.verify(current_state.get(RouteRule.KEY)) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/libnmstate/route_rule.py", line 175, in verify {RouteRule.KEY: {RouteRule.CONFIG: cur_rule_info}}, libnmstate.error.NmstateVerificationError: desired ======= --- route-rules: config: - ip-from: 8.8.8.0/24 ip-to: 200.1.1.0/24 route-table: 100 - ip-from: 8.8.8.0/24 ip-to: 200.1.1.0/24 priority: 30000 route-table: 100 - ip-from: 9.9.9.0/24 ip-to: '' priority: 29999 route-table: 100 current ======= --- route-rules: config: - ip-from: 8.8.8.0/24 ip-to: 200.1.1.0/24 priority: 30000 route-table: 100 - ip-from: 9.9.9.0/24 ip-to: '' priority: 29999 route-table: 100 difference ========== --- desired +++ current @@ -1,9 +1,6 @@ --- route-rules: config: - - ip-from: 8.8.8.0/24 - ip-to: 200.1.1.0/24 - route-table: 100 - ip-from: 8.8.8.0/24 ip-to: 200.1.1.0/24 priority: 30000