Bug 191305 - Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client
Summary: Review Request: crossfire-client-images - Images for the crossfire client
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christopher Stone
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks: 191304
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-05-10 17:04 UTC by Wart
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

(edit)
Clone Of:
(edit)
Last Closed: 2006-05-15 20:56:23 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Wart 2006-05-10 17:04:41 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire-client-images.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/crossfire-client-images-1.9.0-1.src.rpm
Description:
Image files for the crossfire client.

Comment 1 Christopher Stone 2006-05-14 21:16:25 UTC
I am unable to find the Source URL for this package which is hindering the
formal review.  Please explain where to find the sources for this.

$ wget http://dl.sourceforge.net/crossfire/crossfire-client-images-1.9.0.tar.gz
--14:22:33-- 
http://dl.sourceforge.net/crossfire/crossfire-client-images-1.9.0.tar.gz
           => `crossfire-client-images-1.9.0.tar.gz'
Resolving localhost... 127.0.0.1
Connecting to localhost|127.0.0.1|:3128... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
14:22:34 ERROR 404: Not Found.


Comment 2 Wart 2006-05-15 18:09:05 UTC
I pulled this tarball from upstream's source rpm, and had naively assumed that
it was on the download area as well.

I've poked upstream to push this to their download directory, and in the
meantime I'm looking for solutions to generating it myself during the build. 
This might require some changes to the crossfire base package.

Comment 3 Wart 2006-05-15 20:56:23 UTC
This package is now provided by the base crossfire package (#191303).  I'd
prefer to keep it as a separate package so that it can be noarch, but that won't
be done until upstream decides to include a more recent -client-images tarball.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.