This bug has been migrated to another issue tracking site. It has been closed here and may no longer be being monitored.

If you would like to get updates for this issue, or to participate in it, you may do so at Red Hat Issue Tracker .
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1913254 - CVE-2020-17049 krb5: Kerberos: delegation constrain bypass in S4U2Proxy [rhel-8]
Summary: CVE-2020-17049 krb5: Kerberos: delegation constrain bypass in S4U2Proxy [rhel-8]
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED MIGRATED
Alias: None
Deadline: 2021-11-09
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: krb5
Version: 8.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.6
Assignee: Petr Vobornik
QA Contact: ipa-qe
URL: https://github.com/krb5/krb5/pull/1159
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1956994 Bronze_Bit, CVE-2020-17049
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-01-06 11:23 UTC by Martin Kosek
Modified: 2023-09-27 11:35 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1956994 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-09-27 11:16:09 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker FREEIPA-7049 0 None None None 2021-10-07 07:30:21 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker   RHEL-9984 0 None Migrated None 2023-09-27 11:16:02 UTC

Description Martin Kosek 2021-01-06 11:23:28 UTC
Description of problem:

Microsoft updated MS-PAC specification with the details of the extension
to fix CVE-2020-17049[1].

As this is yet another signature structure, it needs to be produced and
verified by the KDC, like the existing ones.

MS-PAC update change file can seen in [2], relevant section change is quoted in [3].

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
krb5-1.18.2-5.el8

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install and configure an IdM Server in a trust relationship with MS AD, with CVE fix applied as per https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4598347/managing-deployment-of-kerberos-s4u-changes-for-cve-2020-17049
2. Switch AD server to Enforcement mode as per the article above
3. Test an IdM-AD cross-forest authentication scenarios

Actual results:
Expected failure due to lack of new signing field in MS-PAC.

Expected results:
No failure

Additional info:


[1] CVE resources:
CVE details:
https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2020-17049
Fix deployment:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4598347/managing-deployment-of-kerberos-s4u-changes-for-cve-2020-17049
Reporter's blog: https://blog.netspi.com/cve-2020-17049-kerberos-bronze-bit-overview/
[2] https://winprotocoldoc.blob.core.windows.net/productionwindowsarchives/MS-PAC/%5bMS-PAC%5d-201123-diff.pdf
[3] --------------------------------------------
2.8.3 (Added Section) Ticket Signature

The ticket signature<17> is generated by the issuing KDC and depends on the cryptographic
algorithms available to the KDC. The ulType field of the PAC_INFO_BUFFER structure (section 2.4)
corresponding to the ticket signature will contain the value 0x00000010. The SignatureType MUST
match the SignatureType in the KDC signature and the key used MUST be the same. The Key Usage
Value MUST be KERB_NON_KERB_CKSUM_SALT [17] ([MS-KILE] section 3.1.5.9). The KDC will use
KDC (krbtgt) key [RFC4120], so that other KDCs can verify this signature on receiving a PAC.

The ticket signature is used to detect tampering of tickets by parties other than the KDC. The ticket
signature SHOULD be included in tickets that are not encrypted to the krbtgt account (including the
change password service) or to a trust account.

The KDC signature is a keyed hash [RFC4757] of the ticket being issued less the PAC itself. To
compute the data to be checksummed, first the KDC must otherwise complete the TGT-REQ and
construct the final service ticket. The ad-data in the PAC’s AuthorizationData element ([RFC4120]
section 5.2.6) is replaced with a single zero byte, and the EncTicketPart ([RFC4120] section 5.3) is
encoded using the ASN.1 Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER).

The resulting hash is placed in the Signature field of the KDC's PAC_SIGNATURE_DATA structure
(section 2.8).

When a ticket is altered as during renewal ([RFC4120] section 2.3), the KDC SHOULD verify the
integrity of the existing ticket signature and then recompute the ticket signature, server signature,
and KDC signature in the PAC.
--------------------------------------------

Comment 1 Martin Kosek 2021-01-06 11:24:32 UTC
Upstream ticket: https://krbdev.mit.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=8974

Comment 21 Jeremy West 2023-08-29 01:59:17 UTC
This bug has been flagged as a "compliance priority" affecting one or more of Red Hat's compliance efforts. CVEs affecting compliance priorities must be resolved.

Comment 24 RHEL Program Management 2023-09-27 11:04:42 UTC
Issue migration from Bugzilla to Jira is in process at this time. This will be the last message in Jira copied from the Bugzilla bug.

Comment 25 RHEL Program Management 2023-09-27 11:16:09 UTC
This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there.

Due to differences in account names between systems, some fields were not replicated.  Be sure to add yourself to Jira issue's "Watchers" field to continue receiving updates and add others to the "Need Info From" field to continue requesting information.

To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to it, and begin with "RHEL-" followed by an integer.  You can also find this issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the "Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like:

"Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567

In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an issue by sending mail to rh-issues. You can also visit https://access.redhat.com/articles/7032570 for general account information.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.