Bug 1913786 - Review Request: bottles - Easily manage Wine prefix in a new way
Summary: Review Request: bottles - Easily manage Wine prefix in a new way
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Vitaly
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-01-07 15:45 UTC by Artem
Modified: 2021-01-16 01:23 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-01-08 03:05:26 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
vitaly: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Artem 2021-01-07 15:45:48 UTC
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/bottles.spec
SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/bottles-2.0.9.7-1.fc33.src.rpm

Description:
Easily manage Wine refix in a new way! (Run Windows software and games on
Linux).

Features:

- Create bottles based on environments (a set of rule and dependencies for
  better software compatibility)
- Access to a customizable environment for all your experiments
- Run every executable (.exe/.msi) in your bottles, using the context menu in
  your file manager
- Integrated management and storage for executable file arguments
- Support for custom environment variables
- Simplified DLL overrides
- On-the-fly runner change for any Bottle
- Various optimizations for better gaming performance (esync, fsync, dxvk,
  cache, shader compiler, offload .. and much more.)
- Tweak different wine prefix settings, without leaving Bottles
- Automated dxvk installation
- Automatic installation and management of Wine and Proton runners
- System for checking runner updates for the bottle and automatic repair in
  case of breakage
- Integrated Dependencies installer with compatibility check based on a
  community-driver repository
- Detection of installed programs
- Integrated Task manager for wine processes
- Easy access to ProtonDB and WineHQ for support
- Configurations update system across Bottles versions
- Backup bottles as configuration file or full archive
- Import backup archive
- Importer from Bottles v1 (and other wineprefix manager)
- Bottles versioning (experimental)
- .. and much more that you can find by installing Bottles!

Fedora Account System Username: atim

Comment 1 Artem 2021-01-07 15:45:52 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=59121903

Comment 2 Vitaly 2021-01-07 16:05:01 UTC
I will review this package.

Comment 3 Vitaly 2021-01-07 16:11:24 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
     upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
     licenses manually.
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/icons/hicolor,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
     desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
[x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: bottles-2.0.9.7-1.fc34.noarch.rpm
          bottles-2.0.9.7-1.fc34.src.rpm
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US refix -> prefix, refit, remix
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US exe -> ex, exes, exec
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US msi -> ism, ms, mi
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US esync -> sync, e sync
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fsync -> sync, f sync
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dxvk 
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shader -> shared, shade, shadier
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wineprefix -> wine prefix, wine-prefix, predefined
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US versioning -> versifying, version, overseeing
bottles.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bottles
bottles.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US refix -> prefix, refit, remix
bottles.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US exe -> ex, exes, exec
bottles.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US msi -> ism, ms, mi
bottles.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US esync -> sync, e sync
bottles.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fsync -> sync, f sync
bottles.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dxvk 
bottles.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shader -> shared, shade, shadier
bottles.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wineprefix -> wine prefix, wine-prefix, predefined
bottles.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US versioning -> versifying, version, overseeing
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 19 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US refix -> prefix, refit, remix
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US exe -> ex, exes, exec
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US msi -> ism, ms, mi
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US esync -> sync, e sync
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fsync -> sync, f sync
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dxvk 
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shader -> shared, shade, shadier
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wineprefix -> wine prefix, wine-prefix, predefined
bottles.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US versioning -> versifying, version, overseeing
bottles.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bottles
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/bottlesdevs/Bottles/archive/2.0.9.7/bottles-2.0.9.7.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : bfbc05cd7a2591e8428704d399234c7fdce40d0600254fca495e17967f7835ec
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : bfbc05cd7a2591e8428704d399234c7fdce40d0600254fca495e17967f7835ec


Requires
--------
bottles (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/python3
    python3-gobject



Provides
--------
bottles:
    application()
    application(com.usebottles.bottles.desktop)
    bottles
    metainfo()
    metainfo(com.usebottles.bottles.appdata.xml)
    mimehandler(application/x-ms-dos-executable)
    mimehandler(application/x-ms-shortcut)
    mimehandler(application/x-msi)
    mimehandler(application/x-wine-extension-msp)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1913786
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, fonts, PHP, Perl, Ocaml, Haskell, Python, R, C/C++
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comment 4 Vitaly 2021-01-07 16:14:09 UTC
> Directories without known owners: /usr/share/icons/hicolor

Please add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme.

All other looks good. This minor issue can be fixed during import. Package approved.

Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2021-01-07 17:03:49 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bottles

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2021-01-07 18:14:58 UTC
FEDORA-2021-2c83cc1e58 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2c83cc1e58

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2021-01-07 18:23:54 UTC
FEDORA-2021-0c8295842d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0c8295842d

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2021-01-08 03:05:26 UTC
FEDORA-2021-2c83cc1e58 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2021-01-08 03:08:15 UTC
FEDORA-2021-0c8295842d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-0c8295842d \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0c8295842d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2021-01-16 01:23:14 UTC
FEDORA-2021-0c8295842d has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.