Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1917506

Summary: Cannot delete content hosts registered before 6.9 upgrade
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Jonathon Turel <jturel>
Component: HostsAssignee: Jonathon Turel <jturel>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: tstrych
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.9.0CC: inecas, rdesouza, ssainkar, sshtein, zhunting
Target Milestone: 6.9.0Keywords: Regression, Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: foreman-2.3.1.10-1 Doc Type: Known Issue
Doc Text:
Content hosts registered prior to Satellite 6.9 upgrade cannot be deleted / unregistered; it produces the following error: “ERROR: update or delete on table "hosts" violates foreign key constraint”.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-03-08 16:30:11 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jonathon Turel 2021-01-18 15:43:09 UTC

Comment 1 Jonathon Turel 2021-01-18 15:43:14 UTC
Created from redmine issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/31669

Comment 2 Jonathon Turel 2021-01-18 15:43:16 UTC
Upstream bug assigned to jturel

Comment 3 Jonathon Turel 2021-01-18 15:46:20 UTC
There may be other issues fixed by this but the report we received from our user states that existing content hosts (prior to 6.9 upgrade) cannot be deleted / unregistered without getting an error like this:

2021-01-15T11:20:37 [E|bac|] PG::ForeignKeyViolation: ERROR:  update or delete on table "hosts" violates foreign key constraint "fk_rails_4c747e18cb" on table "registration_facets"
 | DETAIL:  Key (id)=(8006) is still referenced from table "registration_facets".
 |  (ActiveRecord::InvalidForeignKey)

https://community.theforeman.org/t/cant-delete-any-hosts-after-upgrade-to-katello-3-18/21998

Comment 4 Bryan Kearney 2021-01-19 14:35:51 UTC
Upstream bug assigned to jturel

Comment 5 Bryan Kearney 2021-01-19 14:35:52 UTC
Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite since the upstream issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/31669 has been resolved.

Comment 8 tstrych 2021-03-08 14:36:16 UTC
Hi Jonathon, can you please write me the complete reproducer steps. Firstly I would like to see the problem and then it will be reproduced with the proposed fix.
I am sorry it's not clear enough to me from comment #3

Comment 9 Jonathon Turel 2021-03-08 16:30:11 UTC
Hey Tomas, sorry for the confusion here. When I first saw the user's report I thought there was a more serious issue so I immediately cloned to bugzulla. I actually think the issue is specific to their environment and the fix delivered likely does not even affect a production environment (only dev!), so I am going to close this one out as NOTABUG considering we haven't had any similar reports from downstream or upstream.