Bug 191859 - dvips doesn't work so ps2pdf can't work but dvipdfm does work on MusiXTeX document
Summary: dvips doesn't work so ps2pdf can't work but dvipdfm does work on MusiXTeX doc...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: tetex
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jindrich Novy
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-05-16 05:33 UTC by kmberry
Modified: 2013-07-02 23:15 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-25 13:30:05 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description kmberry 2006-05-16 05:33:56 UTC 
Description of problem:
Using program MusiXTeX to typeset document with latex *.tex makes good *.dvi but
running dvips on *.dvi and gv *.ps produces document without any notes.  Doing
ps2pdf likewise creates a pdf of the bad ps file.  Running dvipdfm produces a
good pdf file so I think there is a bug in tetex-dvips.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tetex-dvips-3.0-24

How reproducible:
Do dvips musixdoc.dvi -o

Steps to Reproduce:
1.latex musixdoc.tex;musixflx musixdoc.tex; latex musixdoc.tex(3 pass)
2. dvips musixdoc.dvi -o
3.
  
Actual results:
A postscript file without notes.

Expected results:
A good postscript file for conversion to pdf with ps2pdf musixdoc.ps


Additional info:
Comment 1 Jindrich Novy 2006-07-18 08:32:28 UTC 
Could you please attach here musixdoc.tex so that I can reproduce it? Thanks.
Comment 2 Jindrich Novy 2006-09-25 13:30:05 UTC 
Closing due to reporter's inactivity.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.