Bug 1918819 - [RFE] Add new dependency on rhosp-release
Summary: [RFE] Add new dependency on rhosp-release
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-tripleo-validations
Version: 17.1 (Wallaby)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
medium
Target Milestone: Alpha
: ---
Assignee: David Peacock
QA Contact: nlevinki
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1916329
Blocks: 1918825
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-01-21 15:53 UTC by Cédric Jeanneret
Modified: 2023-02-16 13:37 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-02-16 13:37:52 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker OSP-2663 0 None None None 2021-11-10 21:17:46 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker VALFRWK-401 0 None None None 2021-08-18 21:37:28 UTC

Description Cédric Jeanneret 2021-01-21 15:53:43 UTC
In order to get a new set of validations ensuring the Director node is correctly configured before actually deploying the softwares, PCD will provide a YAML file in that rhosp-release package.

The work related to the file addition is described here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1916329

Note: the dependency should only affect RHEL-based environment, NOT CentOS.

Comment 1 David Peacock 2021-08-30 12:58:29 UTC
Hey folks,

Some questions and observations I have:

1) Is there any movement on this file by PCD?
2) We have two RFEs (or could be condensed to one), 1918825 and 1918829 dependent on this RFE moving forward.  Who is _actually_ providing this YAML file in the rhosp-release package?  When is this expected?
3) Is it actually viable (based on #2) to get these other RFEs (as referenced in question 2) ready in time for 17?  Or should we retarget 17.1?

Thanks,
David


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.