Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/gnome-break-timer.spec SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/gnome-break-timer-2.0.3-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: This helps you to schedule regular breaks. It will remind you to take them based on how much you are using the computer. It tries to be simple but helpful, and it uses notifications to indicate when a break has arrived. Fedora Account System Username: atim
This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=60232159
I will review this package.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/ ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required. Note: Sources not installed [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/dbus-1, /usr/share/dbus-1/services [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 92160 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: gnome-break-timer-2.0.3-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm gnome-break-timer-debuginfo-2.0.3-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm gnome-break-timer-debugsource-2.0.3-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm gnome-break-timer-2.0.3-1.fc34.src.rpm gnome-break-timer.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/org.gnome.BreakTimer.desktop gnome-break-timer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gnome-break-timer-daemon gnome-break-timer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gnome-break-timer-settings 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: gnome-break-timer-debuginfo-2.0.3-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- gnome-break-timer.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/org.gnome.BreakTimer.desktop gnome-break-timer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gnome-break-timer-daemon gnome-break-timer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gnome-break-timer-settings 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-break-timer/-/archive/2.0.3/gnome-break-timer-2.0.3.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : ac87f7c6135025bfec579b40d7a167bdfb10ce5f7b367dc5baeaaf78864d3dc2 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : ac87f7c6135025bfec579b40d7a167bdfb10ce5f7b367dc5baeaaf78864d3dc2 Requires -------- gnome-break-timer (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): hicolor-icon-theme libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgsound.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit) libjson-glib-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libjson-glib-1.0.so.0(libjson-glib-1.0.so.0)(64bit) libnotify.so.4()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) gnome-break-timer-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): gnome-break-timer-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- gnome-break-timer: application() application(org.gnome.BreakTimer.Settings.desktop) application(org.gnome.BreakTimer.desktop) gnome-break-timer gnome-break-timer(x86-64) metainfo() metainfo(org.gnome.BreakTimer.metainfo.xml) gnome-break-timer-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) gnome-break-timer-debuginfo gnome-break-timer-debuginfo(x86-64) gnome-break-timer-debugsource: gnome-break-timer-debugsource gnome-break-timer-debugsource(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1919368 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, C/C++, Generic Disabled plugins: fonts, PHP, Haskell, Java, Python, R, Perl, Ocaml, SugarActivity Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
> Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires Please add BuildRequires: gcc. > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/dbus-1 Please add Requires: dbus-common.
These minor issues can be fixed during importing to Fedora SCM. Package approved.
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-break-timer
FEDORA-2021-6c44c6360f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6c44c6360f
FEDORA-2021-fce0cef0e5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fce0cef0e5
FEDORA-2021-fce0cef0e5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-fce0cef0e5 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fce0cef0e5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-6c44c6360f has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-6c44c6360f \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6c44c6360f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-fce0cef0e5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2021-6c44c6360f has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.