Created attachment 1750490 [details] screenshot to illustrate Device: Pinephone Description of problem: the grub2-efi-aa64-1:2.04-34.fc34 rpm is not installable. Error: "Unpacking the archive has failed at file /boot/grub2/grubenv;60089395: cpio: symlink" see screenshot. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.04-34
Problem: [root@fedorapine boot]# rpm -U /var/cache/dnf/rawhide-135a69fc59e3201d/packages/grub2-efi-aa64-2.04-34.fc34.aarch64.rpm Fehler: Entpacken des Archivs fehlgeschlagen bei Datei /boot/grub2/grubenv;60101be4: cpio: symlink fehlgeschlagen - Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden Fehler: grub2-efi-aa64-1:2.04-34.fc34.aarch64: installieren fehlgeschlagen Fehler: grub2-efi-aa64-1:2.04-31.fc34.aarch64: löschen übersprungen [root@fedorapine boot]# ll /boot/ insgesamt 14164 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 24. Jan 20:27 allwinner -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 568 22. Jan 19:47 boot.cmd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 640 22. Jan 19:47 boot.scr drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 16. Jan 18:58 efi drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 26. Jan 14:39 grub2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13672456 22. Jan 19:47 Image drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 16. Jan 19:00 loader -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 796915 12. Jan 18:55 u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 194 12. Jan 18:55 update-uboot.sh Fix: [root@fedorapine boot]# touch /boot/grub2/grubenv [root@fedorapine boot]# rpm -U /var/cache/dnf/rawhide-135a69fc59e3201d/packages/grub2-efi-aa64-2.04-34.fc34.aarch64.rpm [root@fedorapine boot]#
caused by a not existing grubenv file.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 34 development cycle. Changing version to 34.
Is this issue still present with the latest grub2 2.06 version?
I was not able to reproduce this issue and was not confirmed that is still present with the latest grub2 package version. I'll just close it, but feel free to reopen and provide more details if the problem persists.
sorry for the late reply, the pinephone does not use grub at all, so we kicked the package from our image ;) due to the 6 months this took, i son't think this bug is relevant anymore.
(In reply to customercare from comment #6) > sorry for the late reply, the pinephone does not use grub at all, so we > kicked the package from our image ;) > Ok, thanks for the info. > due to the 6 months this took, i son't think this bug is relevant anymore. Yes, I think so. Since is the only bug reported for this issue.