Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-fyne-io-glfw.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-fyne-io-glfw-0-0.1.20210130gitf227906.fc34.src.rpm Description: Go bindings for GLFW 3. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo
The gcc issue is a false positive, it isn't required to build the package. You have to fix the duplicated COPYING.txt file by renaming one of them, or moving to versioned subdirs. Please fix this latest issue before importing, package APPROVED. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/ - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/licenses/golang-github-fyne- io-glfw-devel/COPYING.txt See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_duplicate_files ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [-]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required. Note: Sources not installed [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com(golang-github-patrickmn-cache-devel, [...] golang-github-shurcool-graphql-devel, golang-github-grpc-ecosystem- gateway-devel, golang-github-coreos-semver-devel, golang-github- dreamacro-shadowsocks2-devel, golang-github-jackc-pgx-devel-3, golang- github-jarcoal-httpmock-devel, golang-github-dreamacro-clash-devel) [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: golang-github-fyne-io-glfw-devel-0-0.1.20210130gitf227906.fc35.noarch.rpm golang-github-fyne-io-glfw-0-0.1.20210130gitf227906.fc35.src.rpm golang-github-fyne-io-glfw-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/fyne-io/glfw/.goipath golang-github-fyne-io-glfw.src: W: no-%build-section 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- golang-github-fyne-io-glfw-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/fyne-io/glfw/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/fyne-io/glfw/archive/f2279069162d4330df3f989e0064570b4ca4bb9d/glfw-f2279069162d4330df3f989e0064570b4ca4bb9d.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 4b841c36b879ef9ceb877a97a5e949c3c5f89070b653d74a771dfb4459d1f93b CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4b841c36b879ef9ceb877a97a5e949c3c5f89070b653d74a771dfb4459d1f93b Requires -------- golang-github-fyne-io-glfw-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): go-filesystem pkgconfig(dri) pkgconfig(x11) pkgconfig(xcursor) pkgconfig(xi) pkgconfig(xinerama) pkgconfig(xrandr) pkgconfig(xxf86vm) Provides -------- golang-github-fyne-io-glfw-devel: golang(github.com/fyne-io/glfw/v3.0/glfw) golang(github.com/fyne-io/glfw/v3.0/glfw)(commit=f2279069162d4330df3f989e0064570b4ca4bb9d) golang(github.com/fyne-io/glfw/v3.1/glfw) golang(github.com/fyne-io/glfw/v3.1/glfw)(commit=f2279069162d4330df3f989e0064570b4ca4bb9d) golang(github.com/fyne-io/glfw/v3.2/glfw) golang(github.com/fyne-io/glfw/v3.2/glfw)(commit=f2279069162d4330df3f989e0064570b4ca4bb9d) golang(github.com/fyne-io/glfw/v3.3/glfw) golang(github.com/fyne-io/glfw/v3.3/glfw)(commit=f2279069162d4330df3f989e0064570b4ca4bb9d) golang-github-fyne-io-glfw-devel golang-ipath(github.com/fyne-io/glfw) golang-ipath(github.com/fyne-io/glfw)(commit=f2279069162d4330df3f989e0064570b4ca4bb9d) Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1922794 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: C/C++, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Ocaml, R, Java, Python, SugarActivity, Perl, fonts, Haskell, PHP Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
New Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-fyne-io-glfw.spec New SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-fyne-io-glfw-0-0.1.20210130gitf227906.fc35.src.rpm
Thanks for the review!
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-fyne-io-glfw
FEDORA-2021-55c9b4f7bf has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-55c9b4f7bf
FEDORA-2021-02c6531014 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-02c6531014
FEDORA-2021-55c9b4f7bf has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-55c9b4f7bf \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-55c9b4f7bf See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-02c6531014 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-02c6531014 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-02c6531014 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-55c9b4f7bf has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2021-02c6531014 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.