Bug 1922803 (golang-github-srwiley-rasterx) - Review Request: golang-github-srwiley-rasterx - SVG 2.0 path compliant rasterizer
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-srwiley-rasterx - SVG 2.0 path compliant raster...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: golang-github-srwiley-rasterx
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW golang-github-srwiley-oksvg
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-01-31 16:06 UTC by Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
Modified: 2023-06-25 00:45 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-06-25 00:45:40 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2021-01-31 16:06:00 UTC
Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-srwiley-rasterx.spec
SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-srwiley-rasterx-0-0.1.20210130git85cb727.fc34.src.rpm

Description:
 Rasterx is a golang rasterizer that implements path stroking functions capable of SVG 2.0 compliant 'arc' joins and explicit loop closing.   - Paths can be explicity closed or left open, resulting in a line join or end    caps.  - Arc joins are supported, which causes the extending edge from a Bezier curve    to follow the radius of curvature at the end point rather than a straight    line miter, resulting in a more fliud looking join.  - Not specified in the SVG2.0 spec., but supported in rasterx is the arc-clip    join, which is the arc join analog of a miter-clip join, both of which end    the miter at a specified distance, rather than all or nothing.  - Several cap and gap functions in addition to those specified by SVG2.0 are    implemented, specifically quad and cubic caps and gaps.  - Line start and end capping functions can be different.

Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo

Comment 1 Olivier Lemasle 2021-05-10 19:15:56 UTC
 - License ok
 - Latest version packaged
 - Builds in mock
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

rpmlint:
golang-github-srwiley-rasterx-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) rasterizer -> pasteurizer, sterilizer, sterilize
golang-github-srwiley-rasterx-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rasterizer -> pasteurizer, sterilizer, sterilize
golang-github-srwiley-rasterx-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US explicity -> explicit, explicitly, explicit y
golang-github-srwiley-rasterx-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fliud -> fluid, flied
golang-github-srwiley-rasterx-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/srwiley/rasterx/.goipath
golang-github-srwiley-rasterx.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) rasterizer -> pasteurizer, sterilizer, sterilize
golang-github-srwiley-rasterx.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rasterizer -> pasteurizer, sterilizer, sterilize
golang-github-srwiley-rasterx.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US explicity -> explicit, explicitly, explicit y
golang-github-srwiley-rasterx.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fliud -> fluid, flied
golang-github-srwiley-rasterx.src: W: no-%build-section
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.

Package approved.

Comment 2 Package Review 2022-05-24 12:37:48 UTC
Package never imported, no repository created, resetting ticket status.

Comment 3 Package Review 2023-05-25 00:45:26 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 4 Package Review 2023-06-25 00:45:40 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.