spec: https://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-cwcwidth/python-cwcwidth.spec srpm: https://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-cwcwidth/python-cwcwidth-0.1.2-1.fc33.src.rpm user: terjeros koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=61530313 desc: Python bindings for wc(s)widthcwcwidth provides Python bindings for wcwidth and wcswidth functions defined in POSIX.1-2001 and POSIX.1-2008 based on Cython . These functions compute the printable length of a unicode character/string on a terminal.
Update: 0.1.4 Fix Python provide for Fedora 32. spec: https://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-cwcwidth/python-cwcwidth.spec srpm: https://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-cwcwidth/python-cwcwidth-0.1.4-1.fc31.src.rpm user: terjeros koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63361050 desc: Python bindings for wc(s)widthcwcwidth provides Python bindings for wcwidth and wcswidth functions defined in POSIX.1-2001 and POSIX.1-2008 based on Cython . These functions compute the printable length of a unicode character/string on a terminal.
- Expat is MIT: License: MIT - Source0: https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/c/cwcwidth/cwcwidth-%{version}.tar.gz → Source0: %{pypi_source cwcwidth} Package approved, please fix the aforementioned issue before import. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License", "*No copyright* Expat License". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-cwcwidth/review- python-cwcwidth/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3-cwcwidth [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-cwcwidth-0.1.4-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm python-cwcwidth-debugsource-0.1.4-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm python-cwcwidth-0.1.4-1.fc35.src.rpm python3-cwcwidth.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) wc -> WC, cw, w python3-cwcwidth.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wc -> WC, cw, w python3-cwcwidth.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US widthcwcwidth -> bandwidths python3-cwcwidth.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wcwidth -> width python3-cwcwidth.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wcswidth -> widths python3-cwcwidth.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unicode -> Unicode, uni code, uni-code python3-cwcwidth.x86_64: W: invalid-license Expat python-cwcwidth-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-license Expat python-cwcwidth.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) wc -> WC, cw, w python-cwcwidth.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wc -> WC, cw, w python-cwcwidth.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US widthcwcwidth -> bandwidths python-cwcwidth.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wcwidth -> width python-cwcwidth.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US wcswidth -> widths python-cwcwidth.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unicode -> Unicode, uni code, uni-code python-cwcwidth.src: W: invalid-license Expat 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 15 warnings.
Thanks!
SCM request: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32769
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cwcwidth
FEDORA-2021-c8f0ae26ab has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c8f0ae26ab
FEDORA-2021-38649166e5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-38649166e5
FEDORA-2021-0b9680cc56 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0b9680cc56
FEDORA-2021-0b9680cc56 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-0b9680cc56 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0b9680cc56 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-38649166e5 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-38649166e5 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-38649166e5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-c8f0ae26ab has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-c8f0ae26ab \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c8f0ae26ab See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-0b9680cc56 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2021-38649166e5 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2021-c8f0ae26ab has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.