Bug 1926618 - can not create cephfs PVC on OCS with Arbiter
Summary: can not create cephfs PVC on OCS with Arbiter
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1914203
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: rook
Version: 4.7
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Travis Nielsen
QA Contact: Elad
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-02-09 08:35 UTC by Avi Liani
Modified: 2021-03-09 05:55 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-02-09 13:50:19 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Avi Liani 2021-02-09 08:35:12 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):

while trying to create new CephFS PVC (ROX/ RWX) it stay in pending state and not created.


Version of all relevant components (if applicable):

Platform : VMWare with LSO
Mode     : Arbiter
OCP      : 4.7.0-0.nightly-2021-02-06-084550
OCS      : ocs-operator.v4.7.0-254.ci

Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?

yes

Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?

No that i know


Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?

1

Can this issue reproducible?

yes

Can this issue reproduce from the UI?

yes

If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:



Steps to Reproduce:

1. deploy OCP 4.7 and OCS 4.7 with Arbiter on VMWare with LSO
2. from the UI try to create new CephFS PVC



Actual results:

PVC stay in Pending state

Expected results:

The PVC will be created.

Additional info:

Comment 5 Mudit Agarwal 2021-02-09 11:32:41 UTC
I think we should for the fix for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1914203

Comment 7 Mudit Agarwal 2021-02-09 13:50:19 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1920202 ***

Comment 9 Mudit Agarwal 2021-03-09 05:55:42 UTC
Both BZs have same fixes (means combination of the fixes together solve both BZs) but yeah 1914203 is closer.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1914203 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.