Bug 192666 - multilib -devel conflicts for eclipse
multilib -devel conflicts for eclipse
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: eclipse (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
high Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Ben Konrath
:
Depends On: 208908
Blocks: multilibdevel
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-05-22 13:47 EDT by Jeremy Katz
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-04 16:19:37 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Jeremy Katz 2006-05-22 13:47:44 EDT
The package contains conflicting -devel packages for multilib arches.

eclipse-jdt-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc.i386.rpm
warning: eclipse-jdt-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NO
KEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2
Preparing...                ##################################################
        file /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.jdt.source_3.1.2/src/org.ecl
ipse.jdt.core_3.1.2/src.zip from install of eclipse-jdt-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc co
nflicts with file from package eclipse-jdt-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc

eclipse-platform-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc.i386.rpm
warning: eclipse-platform-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signatur
e: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2
Preparing...                ##################################################
        file /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.2/src/or
g.eclipse.compare_3.1.1/src.zip from install of eclipse-platform-devel-3.1.2-1jp
p_13fc conflicts with file from package eclipse-platform-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc
        file /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.2/src/or
g.eclipse.help.base_3.1.0/src.zip from install of eclipse-platform-devel-3.1.2-1
jpp_13fc conflicts with file from package eclipse-platform-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc
        file /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.2/src/or
g.eclipse.platform_3.1.2/launchersrc.zip from install of eclipse-platform-devel-
3.1.2-1jpp_13fc conflicts with file from package eclipse-platform-devel-3.1.2-1j
pp_13fc
        file /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.2/src/or
g.eclipse.tomcat_5.5.15/tomcatwrappersrc.zip from install of eclipse-platform-de
vel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc conflicts with file from package eclipse-platform-devel-3.1.
2-1jpp_13fc
        file /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.2/src/or
g.eclipse.update.core_3.1.2/src.zip from install of eclipse-platform-devel-3.1.2
-1jpp_13fc conflicts with file from package eclipse-platform-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13
fc
        file /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.2/src/or
g.eclipse.update.ui_3.1.1/src.zip from install of eclipse-platform-devel-3.1.2-1
jpp_13fc conflicts with file from package eclipse-platform-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc
eclipse-rcp-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc.i386.rpm

eclipse-rcp-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc.i386.rpm
warning: eclipse-rcp-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NO
KEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2
Preparing...                ##################################################
        file /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.rcp.source_3.1.2/src/org.ecl
ipse.core.runtime_3.1.2/src.zip from install of eclipse-rcp-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13f
c conflicts with file from package eclipse-rcp-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc
        file /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.rcp.source_3.1.2/src/org.ecl
ipse.osgi_3.1.2/src.zip from install of eclipse-rcp-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc confli
cts with file from package eclipse-rcp-devel-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc
Comment 1 Ben Konrath 2006-09-04 16:19:37 EDT
Closing bug becuase -devel packages have been renamed to -sdk to match the
upstream names.
Comment 2 Ben Konrath 2006-11-01 15:50:43 EST
Andrew C., This bug is closed because the Eclipse packages do not have -devel
subpackages any longer. I'm not sure that it should be depending on bug # 208908. 

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.