Bug 19267 - NFS lock struct not initizlized resulting in NULL ptr dereference
NFS lock struct not initizlized resulting in NULL ptr dereference
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel (Show other bugs)
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Arjan van de Ven
Brian Brock
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2000-10-17 12:02 EDT by Thor Nolen
Modified: 2008-08-01 12:22 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2004-09-30 11:38:50 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Thor Nolen 2000-10-17 12:02:35 EDT
nlmsvc_lock calls nlmsvc_create_block to create a nlm_block struct but
initializes the fl_link and fl_block list_head structs that it contains.
The result is that when they are used list_empty() thinks they have other
chained in and locks_delete_block tries to use the null pointers

After nlmsvc_create_block is called to allocate a new nlm_block, there
needs to be:


In nlmsvc_lock (2.4.0-test7 kernel):
  /* If we don't have a block, create and initialize it. Then
   * retry because we may have slept in kmalloc. */
     if (block == NULL) {
       dprintk("lockd: blocking on this lock (allocating).\n");
       if (!(block = nlmsvc_create_block(rqstp, file, lock, cookie)))
         return nlm_lck_denied_nolocks;
#if 1
       /* Must init the file_lock list_head fields or we choke trying to
          use them (they are expected to be circular lists... never 0). */

       goto again;

     /* Append to list of blocked */
     nlmsvc_insert_block(block, NLM_NEVER);

     if (!list_empty(&block->b_call.a_args.lock.fl.fl_block)) {
       /* Now add block to block list of the conflicting lock
          if we haven't done so. */
       dprintk("lockd: blocking on this lock.\n");
       posix_block_lock(conflock, &block->b_call.a_args.lock.fl);
Comment 1 Bugzilla owner 2004-09-30 11:38:50 EDT
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of
the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem

The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, 
and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in
the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.