Bug 1926831 - [IBM][ROKS] Deploy RGW pods only if IBM COS is not available on platform
Summary: [IBM][ROKS] Deploy RGW pods only if IBM COS is not available on platform
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: ocs-operator
Version: 4.6
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: OCS 4.7.0
Assignee: Jose A. Rivera
QA Contact: Petr Balogh
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1939086
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-02-09 14:30 UTC by Sahina Bose
Modified: 2023-09-15 01:00 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1939086 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-19 09:19:24 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github openshift ocs-operator pull 1088 0 None open Disable CephObjectStore when the cloud provider is IBMCloud 2021-02-23 17:04:48 UTC
Github openshift ocs-operator pull 1116 0 None open Bug 1926831:[release-4.7] Disable CephObjectStore when the cloud provider is IBMCloud 2021-03-15 08:46:04 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2021:2041 0 None None None 2021-05-19 09:19:48 UTC

Description Sahina Bose 2021-02-09 14:30:56 UTC 
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):
On IBM Cloud/ROKS, deploy RGW pods only if the platform (for instance, Satellite environment) does not have IBM COS available

Version of all relevant components (if applicable):
4.7

Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?
No - needed to optimize resources consumed
Comment 2 Sahina Bose 2021-02-09 14:50:42 UTC 
@akgunjal.com @nkashyap.com FYI. Neeraj, will you be working on this?
Comment 3 Sahina Bose 2021-02-15 16:05:01 UTC 
Neeraj, Akash - please confirm if you can own the testing for this bug on your environments.
Comment 4 Neeraj K Kashyap 2021-02-15 16:06:26 UTC 
Hi Sahina @sabose 
We are working on this, going to raise the PR this week. Thanks
Comment 7 Sahina Bose 2021-02-23 16:56:08 UTC 
This is needed for IBM ROKS in OCS 4.7
Comment 13 Petr Balogh 2021-03-30 13:57:40 UTC 
Running verification job here:  https://ocs4-jenkins-csb-ocsqe.apps.ocp4.prod.psi.redhat.com/view/Tier1/job/qe-trigger-ibmcloud-managed-1az-rhel-3w-tier1/14/console
Comment 14 Petr Balogh 2021-03-31 09:53:58 UTC 
With COS on build 4.7.0-307.ci:
http://magna002.ceph.redhat.com/ocsci-jenkins/openshift-clusters/j013icm1r3-t1/j013icm1r3-t1_20210324T131824/logs/testcases_1616596886/ocs_must_gather/quay-io-ocs-dev-ocs-must-gather-sha256-cf5d1ce41d6fbd9989f769130ccedcc2c21be3cec1275d268f5fa9629b349875/namespaces/openshift-storage/oc_output/pods_-owide

no RGW pod

Without COS secret on build 4.7.0-327.ci:
http://magna002.ceph.redhat.com/ocsci-jenkins/openshift-clusters/j014icm1r3-t1/j014icm1r3-t1_20210330T140225/logs/testcases_1617123156/ocs_must_gather/quay-io-ocs-dev-ocs-must-gather-sha256-517eed68100619b41782f5b5da94532e8684deacd9f397cf6a15fbf3ec940ee4/namespaces/openshift-storage/oc_output/pods_-owide

RGW pod is there.

Marking as verified.
Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2021-05-19 09:19:24 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage 4.7.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:2041
Comment 17 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-15 01:00:51 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.